Price
$130
1 / 3
2 / 3
matt martian photography
3 / 3
Why We Like It
- It’s difficult to do things differently in a traditional wedge design. Maxfli accomplishes this by using an internal ceramic-matrix-composite insert that positions mass in the optimal position for trajectory control and a soft feel.
- The grooves are CNC milled “micro grooves” that let more groove edges engage the ball for maximum spin.
- The center of gravity is lower in the low-lofted wedges and higher in the high-lofted options to promote the proper trajectory for each loft.
- The head is forged from 1025 carbon steel using a multi-step forging process, and the face is CNC milled to ensure face flatness for more consistency.
- SPECS: 8 options (50-60 degrees), 3 sole grinds, 1 finish
what our testers said
handicap
- all
- low
- mid
- high
COMMENT SUMMARY
Hot List testers noted a pillow‑soft, comfortable impact with standout sole milling and bounce that let the club glide through turf for confident pitch, pop‑chip and check shots. Tight grooves and face texture produced strong spin and predictable landings; many praised its versatile greenside play and automatic, easy bunker exits. It’s forgiving on mis-hits and excels at controlled runners and high soft landings. A few testers reported inconsistent distance control, at times varying by 10–15 yards.
Summaries generated from tester comments with the assistance of AI.
COMMENT SUMMARY
Hot List testers noted crisp, clean contact and smooth turf interaction on full swings, with many praising forgiving mis-hit performance and a simple, dependable setup aided by heel milling. Around the greens it shines for spin, runners and shot‑shaping, and several reviewers singled out strong bunker play. One caveat: distance control was inconsistent, with yardages sometimes jumping 10–15 yards. Overall, a reliable, maneuverable short‑game tool.
Summaries generated from tester comments with the assistance of AI.
COMMENT SUMMARY
Hot List testers noted a pillow‑soft, forged feel with excellent impact comfort and standout sole milling that glides through turf for confident chips and pitches. Tight grooves and face texture produced big, predictable spin and strong stopping power; many praised reliable bunker exits, high-launching options and keen short‑game control from quick-check chips to punch-and-rolls. One caution: a number of testers found full swings tended to feel grabby or flighty.
Summaries generated from tester comments with the assistance of AI.
COMMENT SUMMARY
Hot List panelists observed a well-built, firm-feeling wedge with crisp strikes, strong turf interaction and dependable ball flight. Address shows a prominent toe and scoring lines; full swings produce soft, easy height and longer shots delivered tight dispersion and solid weighting. Greenside versatility and sand play were repeatedly praised — efficient, clean, consistent, with an outstanding lob wedge for spin and control. One noted downside: short-game consistency and full-shot dispersion could be uneven.
Summaries generated from tester comments with the assistance of AI.
Shane
37, Handicap 12
6 years testing
Great turf interaction — clean entry and consistent landings. Easy to loft touch shots or close the face for running chips. In the sand it dug more than it glided.
Megan
40, Handicap 0
2 years testing
Full swings were tough — lots of thin strikes. But greenside it was excellent, and in the sand it really shined. Great short-game club with limited full-swing help.
Jack
36, Handicap 1
3 years testing
Full swings were the highlight — smooth turf interaction with minimal digging. Around the green the face felt too firm for touch shots. Stronger in firm sand than soft, where it dug a bit.
Thomas
61, Handicap 7
10+ years testing
Really liked the sole milling — it helped me glide through turf without effort. The face texture and grooves let me hit those quick-check chips with confidence. Sneaky good greenside tool.
Alejandra
27, Handicap 6
5 years testing
Never quite knew what the ball would do — inconsistent landings and reactions. Tough to shape or finesse. Not enough predictability for short-game work.
SEE ALL (30)
Shane
37, Handicap 12
6 years testing
Great turf interaction — clean entry and consistent landings. Easy to loft touch shots or close the face for running chips. In the sand it dug more than it glided.
Megan
40, Handicap 0
2 years testing
Full swings were tough — lots of thin strikes. But greenside it was excellent, and in the sand it really shined. Great short-game club with limited full-swing help.
Jack
36, Handicap 1
3 years testing
Full swings were the highlight — smooth turf interaction with minimal digging. Around the green the face felt too firm for touch shots. Stronger in firm sand than soft, where it dug a bit.
Thomas
61, Handicap 7
10+ years testing
Really liked the sole milling — it helped me glide through turf without effort. The face texture and grooves let me hit those quick-check chips with confidence. Sneaky good greenside tool.
Alejandra
27, Handicap 6
5 years testing
Never quite knew what the ball would do — inconsistent landings and reactions. Tough to shape or finesse. Not enough predictability for short-game work.
Jamie
52, Handicap 7
3 years testing
Pillow-soft feel on full swings with a really comfortable impact. The bounce worked perfectly for big pitch shots and even little pop chips. Very easy to trust.
Jin
30, Handicap 10
2 years testing
Tight groove spacing gave me big spin and high, predictable full-shot flights. The sole lines helped it glide on chips. Consistent bunker blasts with good stopping power.
Timothy
46, Handicap 17
1 year testing
Trust just wasn’t there. Distance and control varied too much. I liked the feel of the swing, but results were all over the map. Felt like a club you’re unsure about from swing to swing.
Sean
54, Handicap 6
9 years testing
Full swings felt a little sticky, like I needed more grass under the ball. Oddly enough, bunker shots came off much better. Greenside punch-and-roll shots were predictable.
Ricky
47, Handicap 0
10+ years testing
Full shots felt clean with nice feedback up the hands. Greenside performance was smooth and predictable through the turf, but touch and distance control weren’t always easy. Solid overall, just not automatic.
Chris
60, Handicap 8
1 year testing
Firm feel on full swings without adding extra distance. Harder to get the ball up from the bunker, and rollout was more than expected. Not the most responsive overall.
Anand
43, Handicap 6
10+ years testing
Fantastic around the greens with extremely reliable turf interaction. The ball reacted exactly how I pictured it. Full swings were a bit grabby and flighty, and bunker performance was just average.
Jason
49, Handicap 0
10+ years testing
Simple look and simple, dependable performance. Doesn’t require tinkering — it just delivers standard shots well. Heel milling helped it move cleanly through turf and kept it from sticking.
Aaron
45, Handicap 16
1 year testing
Slightly large and heavy but performs exactly as a wedge should. Cuts through turf, pops the ball up cleanly, and drops it soft with good spin. Very dependable ball flight.
Matt
53, Handicap 11
4 years testing
Classic, traditional wedge feel. Not enough built-in forgiveness for what I want as a low-handicap player. Pure, but demanding.
Ryan
50, Handicap 10
8 years testing
Unique wedge — digs in and launches the ball high with soft landings. You can squeeze extra distance when needed, and it cuts through rough like a machete. Velvety feel in bunkers and great control on short-sided chips.
Daniel
34, Handicap 11
6 years testing
Full swings had a digging tendency — the leading edge wanted to grab the ground. The heavier feel added to that. Clean look, but it worked against me in the dirt.
Ryan
47, Handicap 12
3 years testing
Full shots were rough, big dispersion and unpredictable flight. But the lob wedge was outstanding greenside and in bunkers, with great spin and control. Night-and-day difference between setups.
Scott
38, Handicap 16
10+ years testing
Longer shots felt tidy, with tight dispersion and solid weighting. But greenside finesse was inconsistent in rhythm and contact. Full-swing performance outshined the short game.
Gary
38, Handicap 13
10+ years testing
A bit oversized, which cost me some precision. It had mild digging but nothing that wrecked distance or control. Still plenty playable around the green.
Paul
64, Handicap 6
10+ years testing
Soft, pleasant feel with above-average turf interaction on full swings. I just struggled to flight the ball the way I wanted. Great feel, mixed control.
Wesley
31, Handicap 4
3 years testing
Very crisp through the turf, especially on greenside shots where you can get real “nippy” action. But in the bunker it tended to dig too much. Great on grass, tough in sand.
Matt
28, Handicap 7
2 years testing
Only real highlight was the sand play — easy, automatic bunker exits. Everywhere else it seemed to lacked consistency or feel.
Andrew
40, Handicap 8
1 year testing
Long shots and finesse shots both felt blocky, like hitting a brick. Forced me into bump-and-runs because touch shots were unpredictable. Not much feedback for shaping.
BK
42, Handicap 2
10+ years testing
This wedge came close to great for me, but I just couldn’t create enough bite. Good contact, not enough stopping power.
Robert
29, Handicap +2
2 years testing
Very capable greenside wedge with excellent bunker performance. Easy to hit both spinning shots and runners. Good maneuverability for shot-shaping around the green.
Todd
62, Handicap 13
1 year testing
Firm, crisp, well-built wedge with a solid strike. But greenside feedback lacked nuance; everything felt similar off the face. In the sand, though, it was excellent — efficient, clean, and consistent.
Peter
58, Handicap 8
10+ years testing
Great looking, clean, traditional wedge with a forged, bruiser-type feel. Strong, penetrative ball flight and no trouble transitioning to sand shots. Greenside reliability was solid with moderate spin.
Wei
55, Handicap 14
10+ years testing
Liked the address look with that prominent toe and all those scoring lines. Full swings felt soft and easy to flight down. Super easy height from the sand, and greenside shots were versatile and controlled.
Alan
31, Handicap 3
2 years testing
Distance control was inconsistent — yardages jumped by 10–15 yards. It is forgiving on mis-hits, which helps, but tight-lie performance suffered. Not my favorite around the greens.
Shane
37, Handicap 12
6 years testing
Great turf interaction — clean entry and consistent landings. Easy to loft touch shots or close the face for running chips. In the sand it dug more than it glided.
Jin
30, Handicap 10
2 years testing
Tight groove spacing gave me big spin and high, predictable full-shot flights. The sole lines helped it glide on chips. Consistent bunker blasts with good stopping power.
Timothy
46, Handicap 17
1 year testing
Trust just wasn’t there. Distance and control varied too much. I liked the feel of the swing, but results were all over the map. Felt like a club you’re unsure about from swing to swing.
Aaron
45, Handicap 16
1 year testing
Slightly large and heavy but performs exactly as a wedge should. Cuts through turf, pops the ball up cleanly, and drops it soft with good spin. Very dependable ball flight.
Matt
53, Handicap 11
4 years testing
Classic, traditional wedge feel. Not enough built-in forgiveness for what I want as a low-handicap player. Pure, but demanding.
Ryan
50, Handicap 10
8 years testing
Unique wedge — digs in and launches the ball high with soft landings. You can squeeze extra distance when needed, and it cuts through rough like a machete. Velvety feel in bunkers and great control on short-sided chips.
Daniel
34, Handicap 11
6 years testing
Full swings had a digging tendency — the leading edge wanted to grab the ground. The heavier feel added to that. Clean look, but it worked against me in the dirt.
Ryan
47, Handicap 12
3 years testing
Full shots were rough, big dispersion and unpredictable flight. But the lob wedge was outstanding greenside and in bunkers, with great spin and control. Night-and-day difference between setups.
Scott
38, Handicap 16
10+ years testing
Longer shots felt tidy, with tight dispersion and solid weighting. But greenside finesse was inconsistent in rhythm and contact. Full-swing performance outshined the short game.
Gary
38, Handicap 13
10+ years testing
A bit oversized, which cost me some precision. It had mild digging but nothing that wrecked distance or control. Still plenty playable around the green.
Todd
62, Handicap 13
1 year testing
Firm, crisp, well-built wedge with a solid strike. But greenside feedback lacked nuance; everything felt similar off the face. In the sand, though, it was excellent — efficient, clean, and consistent.
Wei
55, Handicap 14
10+ years testing
Liked the address look with that prominent toe and all those scoring lines. Full swings felt soft and easy to flight down. Super easy height from the sand, and greenside shots were versatile and controlled.
Thomas
61, Handicap 7
10+ years testing
Really liked the sole milling — it helped me glide through turf without effort. The face texture and grooves let me hit those quick-check chips with confidence. Sneaky good greenside tool.
Alejandra
27, Handicap 6
5 years testing
Never quite knew what the ball would do — inconsistent landings and reactions. Tough to shape or finesse. Not enough predictability for short-game work.
Jamie
52, Handicap 7
3 years testing
Pillow-soft feel on full swings with a really comfortable impact. The bounce worked perfectly for big pitch shots and even little pop chips. Very easy to trust.
Sean
54, Handicap 6
9 years testing
Full swings felt a little sticky, like I needed more grass under the ball. Oddly enough, bunker shots came off much better. Greenside punch-and-roll shots were predictable.
Chris
60, Handicap 8
1 year testing
Firm feel on full swings without adding extra distance. Harder to get the ball up from the bunker, and rollout was more than expected. Not the most responsive overall.
Anand
43, Handicap 6
10+ years testing
Fantastic around the greens with extremely reliable turf interaction. The ball reacted exactly how I pictured it. Full swings were a bit grabby and flighty, and bunker performance was just average.
Paul
64, Handicap 6
10+ years testing
Soft, pleasant feel with above-average turf interaction on full swings. I just struggled to flight the ball the way I wanted. Great feel, mixed control.
Matt
28, Handicap 7
2 years testing
Only real highlight was the sand play — easy, automatic bunker exits. Everywhere else it seemed to lacked consistency or feel.
Andrew
40, Handicap 8
1 year testing
Long shots and finesse shots both felt blocky, like hitting a brick. Forced me into bump-and-runs because touch shots were unpredictable. Not much feedback for shaping.
Peter
58, Handicap 8
10+ years testing
Great looking, clean, traditional wedge with a forged, bruiser-type feel. Strong, penetrative ball flight and no trouble transitioning to sand shots. Greenside reliability was solid with moderate spin.
Megan
40, Handicap 0
2 years testing
Full swings were tough — lots of thin strikes. But greenside it was excellent, and in the sand it really shined. Great short-game club with limited full-swing help.
Jack
36, Handicap 1
3 years testing
Full swings were the highlight — smooth turf interaction with minimal digging. Around the green the face felt too firm for touch shots. Stronger in firm sand than soft, where it dug a bit.
Ricky
47, Handicap 0
10+ years testing
Full shots felt clean with nice feedback up the hands. Greenside performance was smooth and predictable through the turf, but touch and distance control weren’t always easy. Solid overall, just not automatic.
Jason
49, Handicap 0
10+ years testing
Simple look and simple, dependable performance. Doesn’t require tinkering — it just delivers standard shots well. Heel milling helped it move cleanly through turf and kept it from sticking.
Wesley
31, Handicap 4
3 years testing
Very crisp through the turf, especially on greenside shots where you can get real “nippy” action. But in the bunker it tended to dig too much. Great on grass, tough in sand.
BK
42, Handicap 2
10+ years testing
This wedge came close to great for me, but I just couldn’t create enough bite. Good contact, not enough stopping power.
Robert
29, Handicap +2
2 years testing
Very capable greenside wedge with excellent bunker performance. Easy to hit both spinning shots and runners. Good maneuverability for shot-shaping around the green.
Alan
31, Handicap 3
2 years testing
Distance control was inconsistent — yardages jumped by 10–15 yards. It is forgiving on mis-hits, which helps, but tight-lie performance suffered. Not my favorite around the greens.
NO REVIEWS
There are no tester reviews here.
A Skeptic’s Guide To New Golf Equipment
Featured In
Related Clubs
1 / 13
Callaway
Opus SP
$200
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Gold
$200
The two-piece design features a pocket low in the head. This concentrates mass higher in the club, raising the center of gravity for a penetrating flight and the kind of control needed to flight shots or attack tight pins.
A new 17-degree groove angle has tighter pitch spacing to promote more groove-edge contact. This produces consistent spin across a variety of lies.
The grooves and a deep cross-hatch laser pattern across the face combine to generate additional friction for maximum control.
2 / 13
Cleveland
RTZ
$180
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Gold
$180
Cleveland used a proprietary steel alloy that features a tighter grain structure for a softer feel. It also saves six grams.
In its raw state, the alloy has the benefit of not rusting over time as other steel alloys tend to do. This preserves the look and performance of the grooves.
The ZipCore material in the hosel saves weight, some of which is repositioned low and toward the toe where golfers tend to strike the ball. The rest of the saved weight is used to make the hosel longer and wider to increase forgiveness.
3 / 13
Ping
s259
$218
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Gold
$218
The grooves are milled and loft dependent. The 46- to 52-degree wedges maximize groove volume for better control on full shots. The 54- to 62-degreee options are tightly spaced to engage more edges on the ball.
A face blast adds friction, delivering extra spin and assisting launch.
The lower-lofted wedges have a straighter leading edge and center of gravity more in line with the center of the face to make the transition from the irons seamless. Higher lofts have extra offset to provide a comfortable look at address.
4 / 13
TaylorMade
Milled Grind 5
$200
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Gold
$200
TaylorMade’s latest wedge line is fully forged, a first for the Milled Grind line and a decision made as a result of its tour staff’s request for more feel.
The wedge is the first in the line to use saw-milled grooves, which were created using a new machining process that tightens tolerances and allows engineers to push groove geometry. The grooves have steeper walls and sharper edges for maximum grab—especially on partial shots.
The raw face features a tread design between the grooves to channel away moisture like a set of all-weather tires. This produces 13 percent more spin from damp conditions, according to the company.
5 / 13
Titleist
Vokey Design SM11
$200
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Gold
$200
A new version of Titleist’s Spin Milled grooves features 5 percent more volume than the SM10 to channel away debris and retain more spin.
A new directional face texture provides increased friction and prolongs contact on the face, delivering reliable spin on short shots.
A heat treatment is applied to increase the durability of the groove edges to prolong maximum stopping power.
6 / 13
Cleveland
CBZ
$180
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$180
The fifth generation of the company’s cavity-back wedges charts a fresh path by using the same Z-alloy found in the company’s tour-played RTZ line. The Z-alloy is 25 percent softer than the 431 stainless steel used in past CBX models.
Cleveland’s research found that about 80 percent of all wedge shots by middle- and high-handicappers occur slightly toward the toe side of the center of the face, right where CBZ’s sweet spot is designed to be.
The “gelback” insert in the cavity is a thermoplastic-urethane polymer designed to control unwanted vibration and sound.
7 / 13
Cobra
King
$170
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$170
The grooves are produced using a CNC milling process and feature a new face blast to help improve performance in wet conditions.
Cobra updated the popular “notch” grinds in the high-lofted wedges based on the old designs made by short-game guru Phil Rodgers. This helps the contact area in the heel glide through the turf more easily when opening the face on the 58- and 60-degree models.
The wedges are manufactured from 8620 carbon steel using a metal-injection-molding process that produces tighter manufacturing tolerances, reducing the need for hand polishing that can lead to inconsistencies.
8 / 13
Edel
SMS Pro
$180
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$180
The SMS Pro continues Edel’s tradition of customizable wedges, but on this updated version, a 25-gram weight is used in place of three screws. Those with an over-the-top swing will want more weight in the heel to promote the face staying closed at impact. If you tend to pull wedge shots, the weight goes in the toe.
A new groove pattern adds three grooves depending on the loft for more spin. In addition to the updated groove pattern, Edel continues its use of cross-hatch laser etching to increase surface roughness for maximum control.
CNC milling ensures consistent sole geometry on each wedge as opposed to hand polishing.
9 / 13
LA Golf
FS-26
$200
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$200
To maximize spin, these wedges use saw-cut grooves and milled-face roughness.
The wedges are forged in a multi-stage process from 1025 carbon steel to deliver the soft feel players prefer.
A hydrophobic coating repels water from the face, resulting in more consistent shots and improved performance in wet conditions.
10 / 13
Mizuno
Mizuno Pro T1
$180
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$180
The new muscle-back shape has a taller heel section and more mass in the upper portion of the head to bring ball flight down for greater control.
The head is no longer made from boron but rather a softer 1025 carbon steel to improve feel.
The sharper leading edge with additional sole camber reduces turf resistance for those who tend to take divots.
11 / 13
Proto-Concept
RR Forged
$310
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$310
To simplify the wedge-selection process, Proto-Concept developed three sole grinds that differ in effective bounce and are based on playing style.
The NT grind is on lower lofts and is primarily for full swings. The SP grind is on lofts 56 and up and is designed for those with sweeping swings. The AG grind is another option for 56 degrees and up and is made for those who hit down on the ball.
Through precise cold forging, groove width and depth have been optimized for maximum spin. The face features two types of laser milling—diagonal and horizontal—significantly improving spin in wet conditions.
12 / 13
PXG
Stick'em Forged
$TBD
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$TBD
Placing weight in the high-toe area improves stability and promotes a more consistent trajectory.
The cross-sectional area of the grooves is significantly larger. This allows for more displacement of grass, water and debris to give the groove edge a better chance of interacting with the cover of the ball.
The wedges are three-times forged to produce an exact geometry and pure feel.
13 / 13
TaylorMade
Hi-Toe 4
$180
|
Golf Galaxy
GD SCORE
GD HOT LIST SCORE
Hot List Silver
$180
These wedges are more than just their high-toe shape. The pronounced shaping shifts the center of gravity higher and toward the toe to produce shots with increased spin.
The computer-milled sole grinds eliminate excessive hand work in the manufacturing process for more consistency from club to club.
Laser-etched ribs between the grooves create additional surface friction. Called “spin tread,” the rows of diagonal lines between the grooves are designed to redirect moisture to create cleaner contact with the groove edges.