Editor's Blog

Results for January 2012 Back to Editors' Blog Index

Poll says Tiger is still the draw. By a lot.

You are fond of complaining here that we overdo our coverage of Tiger Woods. Golf World got just such a letter this week, claiming that it was becoming "Tiger World." Okay, a new poll out yesterday suggests that we aren't overstating Tiger's influence in the game. 

Turnkey Sports, in its monthly poll, asked sports executives two questions about who they'd want to watch on television. The results are pretty one-sided:

Which of the following golfers are you most interested in watching play on TV? 
Tiger Woods - 53% 
Rory McIlroy - 15% 
Phil Mickelson - 7% 
Dustin Johnson - 2% 
John Daly - 2% 
Sergio Garcia - 1%
Steve Stricker - 1% 
Tom Watson - 1% 
Zach Johnson - 1%  

Which of the following golfers would you be most interested in tuning in to watch in the final round of a golf tournament if he is leading after three rounds? 
Tiger Woods - 61% 
Rory McIlroy - 9% 
Phil Mickelson - 8% 
John Daly - 3% 
Tom Watson - 2% 
Dustin Johnson - 2% 
Sergio Garcia - 1% 
Steve Stricker - 1% 
Zach Johnson - 1% 
K.J. Choi - 1% 
Jim Furyk - 1% 
Translation: Tiger is still the man, especially when he's in contention. You watching that Abu Dhabi tournament this week?
Bob Carney

Hungover Caddy: Yes or No ?

Golf Digest's newest feature, the Hungover Caddy column, seems to have no fence-sitters. You love it. You hate it. Max Adler is responsible for the column each month, but it's HC, with his sardonic takes on every subject from bunker maintenance to the etiquette of talking to someone else's golf ball, who rules the realm. Not everyone sees eye-to-bloodshot-eye with him. For every one of these.... 

Love "Hungover Caddie" feature. Been waiting a long time for someone to talk seriously about how to rake a bunker.
Jeffrey Briggs 
Hollywood
We get at least one of these.... 

I, and I suspect a host of other Evans Scholars, am offended by your column "Hungover Caddie." Many of us worked long and hard to provide caddie services, starting as young teenagers, working through high school and being awarded the Evans Scholarship to attend college. The column is not funny -- in fact, it is an insult and offensive to those of us who have had the privilage to work in this profession. Please remove the column from your magazine.
Ken Marnocha 
Zionsville, IN

Humor either works or it doesn't, and it may work for you when it doesn't for me. As these letters and many others like them demonstrate, this is purely a case of what you consider funny. Don't see, however, how this is an insult to the sober, hard-working caddies among us, Evans Scholars or not. A Scholar myself, I've never thought that the column had anything to do with my kind of caddy. But I've known a few loopers over the years---none of whom would have qualified for the scholarship--who might have been the HC. The point is, it's meant to be fun. We're sorry if it doesn't appeal to everyone.
Bob Carney

Pecan Valley Golf Club, RIP

It's been way too common this year, on twitter, on the web, in our magazines, that we hear about another course closing. It's especially sad when that course has played an important role in the game's history, was designed by one of the game's outstanding architects, and has hosted a major. Or, in this case, all three:Pecan ValleyGolf Club in San Antonio, designed by Perry Maxwell, home to the 1963 PGA Championship won by Julius Boros. The announcement, earlier this month:images.jpeg

"As of January 9, 2012 Pecan Valley Golf Club is no longer open for golf. Ownership has decided to cease operations during the off-season months to investigate all viable options for the Pecan Vally Golf Course. Please check back with us at this website for updates on the course's status early this spring."
The closing drew this letter from a Texas pastor. 

I was saddened to read of the closing of Pecan Valley Golf Course. I played there only one time, but was paired with a man with a bucket-list of playing every public accessible course that had hosted either the US Open or the PGA Championship. His driver had an extra-long shaft to compensate for a short left arm. He contracted polio as a kid and his left arm, besides being shorter, had no strengthen. However, his left wrist was fused in the perfect supinated position from Hogan's "Five Fundamentals." That day he beat me like a drum at a high school pep rally. Pecan Valley may be closed but it gave me one of my great experiences in the game of golf.
Pastor Allen Mosiman Corpus Christi, TX


Well said, Allen. 


Bob Carney

Photo: Geoff Shackelford.com

Reader quits golf. Here's why.

We don't get many of these letters. Those who write us are, for the most part, wedded to the game, addicted in some cases, obsessed with getting better. Not reader Dean Wilson, who, by the way, is a pretty good player. He's had it. 

I'm 51 years old and have decided to abandon golf for a multitude of reasons. First let me say that it is not because I can't play well. My handicap is around 5 and I've won a few tournaments as a junior golfer. It's not uncommon for me to shoot even par on a regulation golf course a couple times per year. You must be thinking I'm crazy to quit.  

My five reasons for quitting a game I could never imagine quitting one day: 

Practice Time: I once did play to a 1 handicap. This required practicing my golfing skills at least four to five days a week and playing most of the other days. Admittedly my skill level has dropped in recent years because I simply do not have time for practice anymore. Family and career choices take precedent. It's become frustrating and wearisome taking three from the edge of the green or only hitting six greens in regulation. Simply stated, it's not very much fun playing at a lesser skill level. 

Cost: The price of game is exorbitant. I recently resigned from a local club because dues and other ancillary costs computed to about $300 per round of golf. Playing golf at nice resorts costs a minimum of $125 and sometimes as much as $300. Then you have the cost of equipment. A newly designed putter retails for $200 to $350. Are you kidding me? One golf club? And the thing even more incredulous is that the golfer procuring said putter will likely not putt any better than his/her bullseye putter sent to the club bin long ago. 

Modernism: An old grade-school chum introduced me to a group of guys stating, "Dean began playing golf before it was cool." What an interesting comment. It's now cool to play golf because of the media frenzy, money, and celebrity. Golf was a game where the toughest survived. Pros attended Q school and then had to qualify each week to get one of a few spots at tournaments. I remember reading stories of Trevino practicing until his hands bled or the leg pain Hogan endured each round after his horrific auto accident. Palmer, Nicklaus, and Player were class acts especially with fans. My dad once said, "In my day the clubs were made of wood and the players made of steel." 

Golf Fans: Is anyone else irritated when some cretin at a golf tournament shouts "Get in the hole" after a player hits a drive? Is there no etiquette and class anymore? The mania that is the 16th hole at the Phoenix Open is nothing more than a booze-up for classless boors who determine their golf success by the number of beers consumed in 18 holes and how many vulgar remarks they can utter to the cart girl. USGA 

Capitulation: I can hit a golf ball further today than when I was younger and more supple. Why? The equipment is juiced. Golf balls fly farther and clubs invoke greater distances. We also now can use laser devices for distance. The USGA has caved in to equipment manufacturers and those who argue "the game is more fun." The club or the ball should not cause greater distance or ease in shaping a golf shot. That is supposed to reside with the player.
Dean Wilson

Dean, we won't try to talk you out of it. But we will say that golf remains a great sport for the reasons it always has: the places we play, the fun of play well (for us), and most of all the people with whom we play. Even as age takes some of that second reason away, we would miss Nos. 1 and 3 a lot. And we expect you will, too. Let us know if you change your mind.
Bob Carney

Enough with the Tiger, Tiger Tiger!!! Or not.

Tim Rosaforte's Voices column in Golf World this week, with details of Tiger Woods' move to Jupiter, and sightings of him and his kids at the local mall, seemed innocent enough and mildly interesting to some of us. Not, however, to this California reader, who has had enough of Tiger until he raises his profile as a golfer. It's a sentiment we hear often, except from the other half of the readership who can't get enough of all things Tiger. 111208_tiger_feinstein_140.jpg

Is it an obsession with this publication to inform us of Tiger Woods every move ?! Westwood, Poulter and Stricker won tournaments last week. The LPGA's season was expanded. Luke Donald and this wife just had an addition to their family. But who gets full page coverage just because he is enjoying his new digs--Tiger Woods! The readership and this reader, in particular, would like to be informed of the events in all of the Golf World and not just Mr. Woods'. How is Mr. Mickelson and his family or David Toms and their, respective, families doing these days?
M. Marlene Godoy, D.D.S. Irvine, CA

So which camp are you in? Had enough--or not enough--of Tiger Woods? Judging by a recent quiz we did that included a question about Tiger  Masters, most of you think he'll win again there, and hope he does. What's more I suspect his pairing with Tomy Romo at Pebble Beach will draw tons of attention and viewership. Sorry, Doctor.

Bob Carney

Here's a slow-play memo you might want to borrow

The topic of slow play came up again last week in Hawaii, where it took longer to play a hole at the Hyundai Tournament of Champions than it does to roast a luau pig. Luke Donald tweeted the obvious: "Slow play is killing golf." Many readers agree and some are working to resuscitate it.

slow_play_300.jpgOne of the worst kinds of slow golfers: the guy who never picks up. Photo by Cy Cyr


Remember "You know you're a redneck if...." ? Well, a North Carolina reader has adapted that to speed up play at his club. It's a memo you might want to borrow at some point.

Slow Golfers:

It is a fact that we have all had to endure the company of slow golfers from time to time. The one thing that all slow golfers have in common is that they do not see that they are the slow ones. A comment like "nobody is pushing us" is the favorite expression of the slow golfer. Nobody is pushing you because they either went home or they jumped you. It is your job to stay up with the group in front of you, not ahead of the group behind you. If you are unsure of what category you fit into, I have come up with a test... 
1. You might be a slow golfer if ... you wait in your cart for your partner to hit, so he can drive you six yards to your ball. 
2. You might be a slow golfer if ... when it is your turn, you are not even close to being ready, i.e., the guy beside you is running down the fairway after his hat and you are throwing up grass to see if there is any wind. 
3. You might be a slow golfer if ... you leave your cart and walk 50 yards to your ball (in an effort to ascertain some mysterious information) and then make the journey back to select 3 clubs from your bag. 
4. You might be a slow golfer if ... you spend quite a bit of time discerning that you have 245 to the hole and not 243, despite the fact that you have not hit it either 245 or 243 since 1962. 

5. You might be a slow golfer if ... you have decided for a multitude of reasons that you are not going to follow the trend of buying a gps system ... but when someone in the group has one, you will make them come over and give you a reading for everyone of your shots that day. 

6. You might be a slow golfer if ... you are quite happy to use a delegation to help you read a triple-breaking, 45-ft putt.  Seriously, who are you kidding? 
7. You might be a slow golfer if ... you are of the opinion that each golf course employs 18 rangers and that explains why there is always one on the hole that you are playing.

8. You might be a slow golfer if ... you hear comments like "Get off the green," "What now?" or the doozie, "You are without question, the slowest golfer that I have ever seen." These might be indicators to look out for.

Pearse Mahon,

Oak Ridge, NC

Love your list, Pearse, especially No. 7. We'd love to hear our readers suggest others. I'll start. "You know you're a slow golfer if a Bridgestone 3 just whizzed by your head as you recorded your first fairway-hit standing next to the green." It belonged to a guy I know.

 This year:  Play Fast!

 -- Bob Carney
 
Read more

Like our readers, Luke Donald is fed up with slow play!

A topic that always gets our readers attention--we have dozens of letters from you on this--is slow play. For that reason we recommend the Devil Ball Golf column by Jonathan Wall on Yahoo Sports today. Wall takes off on a tweet by Luke Donald on the subject: 

images.jpeg
It's not that hard, be ready when it's your turn. Slow play is killing our sport — Luke Donald (@LukeDonald) January 9, 2012 

Wall's column is worth a read. An excerpt:

Without a doubt, slow play is the biggest hot button issue in golf at the moment. With players vying for record purses each week, it makes sense that one would take extreme care with every approach shot and putt during a round. A missed shot here or there could be the difference between taking home a seven-figure check and finishing in the middle of the pack. But in recent years, guys have been taking too much time over shots.
While you're in the mood, check out short game instruction from Donald and other pros on golfdigest.com today. And when you improve your short game, play faster!

Bob Carney

Reader: Hot List is "Not" List. We beg to differ.

Golf Digest's Hot List Issue is the most anticipated and popular of the year and has been since we launched the annual equipment review a decade ago. As inevitable as our annual review are letters like this one from Michigan, questioning the integrity of the survey. (You can also find these cynical sentiments on our sister site, GolfWrx.com.) Here's one letter -- and our response.

120103_hot_list_drivers_640.jpg
Saw your new "Hot" List on the newsstand the other day. I was strangely curious, so I flipped through it. Big surprise, it's more of the same... a pathetic joke. It seems like you're not even trying, to be honest. Other's- including myself- have stated the "Hot" List is just fluffy advertising for the club companies paying your bills (at about $70k/per, unless numbers have changed recently). You don't do much to change opinions. Only one "under the radar" brand by my count--Scor wedges--made your list? They received a silver "award"... again, not much of a surprise. But hey, it gives your little advertise... I mean, "list"... credibility, right? It's pretty obvious you aren't looking out for your reader's best interests, so why not just give up the act? That's my $.02, which I'm sure you'll have fun side-stepping the issue and making little (supposedly) ingenious jabs, especially about the health of my state's economy like last time. It's not like you'd back up your "findings" with stats and facts... this is just an "it's good because we say it is" kind of list, after all. Thanks for reminding me, again, why I don't pay for your magazine.
Justin Blair Michigan

Today in the Times I saw an ad for "The Cigar of the Year," as determined by Cigar Aficionado magazine. I immediately thought of all the cigar companies that did not produce the "Cigar of the Year," some of them, I'm sure, advertisers in that publication. The fact is, product reviews are not the most direct route to manufacturers' hearts, advertisers or no. Any company worth its salt believes that virtually every product it makes deserves a medal. What's more, it is expert in identifying the reasons its competitors' deserve no such recognition.

No, we don't base the Hot List on advertising and we have the post-publication feedback from advertisers to prove it. What most golf manufacturers do appreciate about our list, however, is that we're careful in our review, consistent in our methodology and determined to improve the process whenever we can. We take it seriously and spend seriously to make sure it has integrity.

More than anything, they appreciate the issue's dominant message: New equipment that takes advantage of new technology (when properly fitted) benefits your game and can make golf more enjoyable. Years ago, we devoted barely a page an issue to equipment coverage; now we may commit 50 more pages in a single issue to it!

That said, it should come as no surprise that larger companies with larger research-and-design budgets create products that take advantage of the latest scientific and component breakthroughs. They invest grandly to discover the next big thing. But start-ups make discoveries, too, and the Hot List has identified many great small companies in the decade since we began it--Scratch Golf and Bobby Jones Golf to name a couple in addition to the one you note. 

The real test of our integrity is in the playing. We don't tell you what to buy, but we do recommend a list of clubs to consider, and to test. We think you'll be less cynical after you do. 

Bob Carney

GW Reader: You missed the point on Sharp Park

Bill Fields' excellent coverage (in photos and reportage) of the controversy over and possible closing of Sharp Park GC in California, drew this letter from a reader opposed to keeping the course open. And, yes, he's a golfer. 

gwsl12_sharp_park-1.jpg
Your article in the Bunker section of your magazine was extremely one-sided regarding the fight to save Sharp Park GC in Pacifica, California. All your article said on behalf of the opponents of Sharp Park was that they contend the course harms two species, the California Red Legged Frog, and the San Francisco garter snake. 

Among points your article skipped was that the San Francisco garter snake might just be the most beautiful snake in the United States, and that it is on the verge of extinction. The San Francisco garter snake's desperately diminished population is only found in rare coastal and bay side wetlands in San Mateo county. Numerous pesticides known or suspected of harming these snakes are used there. 

There are golf courses all over America, and most are in areas where they are not harmful to sensitive ecosystems. In fact, quite often they enhance the environment for local wildlife. This is not the case at Sharp Park. Sharp Park GC has been around since 1932. The San Francisco garter snake has been around for millions of years, and now faces extinction at the hands of humans. I am a golfer. Are we golfers so arrogant as to choose to condemn a species to extinction in order to save one muny?
Marcus Miller Crown Point, IN

Thanks, Marcus. Well-said. In December a veto by San Francisco Mayor Edwin Lee blocked transfer of the site to the National Park Service, which would probably have spelled its doom. Stay tuned.
Bob Carney

Photo: Bill Fields

The latest on golf digest

Close

Thank you for signing up for the Tip of the Week newsletter.

You will receive your first newsletter soon.
Subscribe to Golf Digest
Golf Digest Tablet Editions

Twitter

Your Instagram Golf Photos
Subscribe today

Golf Digest Rewards

Golf Equipment: 3Balls.com - New and used golf equipment

Sign-up for Golf Digest's Above The Cut