Two things about the February 14 issue got your attention: Rickie Fowler and his non-traditional look on the cover--which a few of you took exception to--and Jaime Diaz's "Final Say" column on the last page, in which he addressed obstacles to the game's continued growth. Wrote Jaime:
"The game's challenge is to create more low-priced playing fields....Pitch-and-putts should be valued like rare relics. Struggling courses should be turned into 12-holers, with the remaining six holes devoted to beginners and other learners...."
That prompted this letter from a Texas reader:
How much more right-on can you be? (This is going to be too lengthy for a spot in letters to the editor). Golf is headed, or actually has gone, the direction you address. I am a product of the caddy yard (Hinsdale G.C., Clarendon Hills, IL, 1956-1964) where I learned the game, rules, and etiquette by watching. As I began playing the game I gravitated toward looping for good players, disdaining the half-dollar tip that sometimes came along at this "no tipping allowed" country club.
What I learned (game, rules, etiquette) is invaluable. My playing partners look to me for rules, but not often enough for etiquette. Your point about courses being too long and/or golfers playing from tees one or two iterations longer than they can handle is also right-on. And, yes, it’s the macho in us males. But it’s b.s. because we know that the ability to actually hit a green in regulation and putt for a birdie is one of the sweetest parts of the game. As a senior I am getting some relief from “the tips,” but often when I play with my younger pals they insist on playing a long course. Some of them can handle the length still, but I cannot.
The Barney Adams comment about 200 yard drives on 6400-yard courses equating to pros playing 8,000-yard courses is lost on most of us. I loved your article.
Marshall (Barney) Stewart, Fort Worth, TX
And this one, excerpted, from an Arizona reader:
I learned the game on two very different courses. On a small executive course named Cyprus golf course (that has since gone out of business and been reclaimed by the dessert) that had two 9-hole courses, one longer than the other. To me at the time the course was challenging, but I was determined to learn the game and the golf course. I also played Rolling Hills Golf course, a 3,828-yard par-62 with two also very distinctive 9 holes.
As Mr. Diaz said that many young golfers do, I learned by "playing" golf and beating balls on the driving range and have never having taken a lesson. As I got better and started hitting the ball further I would often return to these golf courses to get a measurement of how far my game had come (and in the case of Rolling Hills still do). I have since played many different golf course many of them much to long and have found that I much more enjoy the shorter courses that are visual. Many courses here are long and straight but I tend to like the ones that are tree lined and have some dog-legs. In short, make courses with character not length.
Juano Bello, Tempe, AZ
Dearborn Hills Golf Course, where I learned to play in Michigan, had neither character nor length, but adjoined the most comfortable, sagging old concrete-floored clubhouse you can imagine, with perfect burgers. That combination works, too, for growing the game. They've fixed Dearborn Hills up now, which had to happen, but I choose to remember the old days, when, after caddying all week at the nearby country club, we felt like members there.
Bob Carney