Editor's Blog

Results for September 2010 Back to Editors' Blog Index

Meet Sean Foley

To say golf's hottest new teacher met New York society last night may be overstating it a bit, but at least he met Golf Digest.

Sean Foley, our November cover subject, one of Golf Digest's Top Young Teachers, and our newest teaching professional, (and yes, Tiger's coach), spoke to a gathering of advertisers, staff members and guests at Michael's restaurant in Manhattan. He demonstrated that his job, working with stars like Woods, Justin Rose, Hunter Mahan and Sean O'Hair, is in equal parts teacher, philosopher, physicist, psychiatrist and entertainer. "Hey, I'm amazed it works sometimes," he said laughing. "It's all creation. You're making it up."

In a game where editors are used to cautious understatement, Foley is a whoosh of arctic Canadian air, brash, self-deprecating, funny and startling in turns. "As teachers, we live in the idea that if I'm speaking, they're learning, but that's just not the case, " said Foley. "My job is to get the lesson across without even saying it." Teachers who try to impress students with all they know just "lose the plot."

Foley is equal parts humility and cockiness. "I told one writer in Toronto my goal was to teach Tiger Woods. I got smoked. Apparently when mediocrity meets confidence, it sees arrogance," he says.

Davis Love Jr., Nelson Mandela, Plato, Ben Hogan: They're all part of Foley's patter, and he's not afraid of critics who say he's borrowed from other teachers -- among them the Stack & Tilt team of Plummer and Bennett. "There are no new ideas," he argued. "Most people who had the original thought and said it were put on a stake and burned. I don't want to be that guy. Yes, I'm far more similar to Andy Plummer than I am to David Leadbetter or Hank Haney. But at the end of the day, who owns anything?"

He also dismisses critics of his most famous star. "Tiger has only been a 'different player' for what, eight months now?" said Foley. "He's won 14 majors in 71 tries. He's only 34. He will break Jack's record. It's a matter of when, not if." By Foley's estimate, Tiger has about 42 more majors to play and he'll win at least 4 of those. "I think he'll win 22 or 23 altogether," he says.

As for Foley's impact on that quest: "Hey, I'm teaching things he's already done before. He's done it. We're talking about a straight-up genius here." It occurs to you that Foley's outspokenness may land him into trouble. He says the prospect doesn't phase him. "It was at the point that I became unattached from the results that I got good at this," he says. "If I can't be myself, I'd rather go back to teaching 10 and 20 handicaps in Toronto."

And what advice does he give those high handicappers? Foley had three pieces of advice, mostly centered around tempering one's expectations -- and all about enjoying the game. 1. Create your own par. "Par is 72, but that's for pros. I told one student your par on the first hole, a par 5, is an 8." It may seem silly, he says, but it takes pressure off. 2. Stop and smell the roses. Most amateurs don't have the time or dedication to make significant swing changes., Foley says. Give yourself a break. "This whole idea of your old swing 'coming out' after you've tried to make improvements -- hey, it never left. Unless you want to give up your job, your family and hit millions of balls, you learn to live with it." 3. Concentrate on the "70 per cent of shots" from 110 yards and in. "My advice is got to the driving range or wherever you practice and take a sand wedge, a pitching wedge and a putter and spend two hours with those clubs. Leave all the others in the trunk."

gwar01_foley_blog_470.jpg

You'll get plenty more from Foley in the coming months in Golf Digest. Check out his OnDemand clinic at golfdigest.com/ondemand. What's more, Kodak, which sponsored last night's event along with Gentleman Jack, presented Sean with its new PlaySport video camera (photo) and from time to time he and other Best Young Teachers will provide us with the analysis their analysis of student swings. We're looking forward to that.

-- Bob Carney

More of your votes for Feinstein's FedEx revise

Whether Sunday's finish was to your liking or not, and whether you agreed with Johnny Miller's assessment that you needed "a team from MIT" to figure out the scoring, John Feinstein's column in the September 20 issue of Golf World continues to draw tons of comment. Feinstein argued that the FedEx Cup playoff system doesn't work because it devalues the majors, among other things. A few readers suggested that John chill out. 

John Feinstein speaks the honest truth; however, regardless of how the Tour decides to split up such a huge sum of money, he is missing the most important point, that fans are watching some really great golf. John, sit back and enjoy. 
Robert Hunt, Plaistow, NH

Most of you, however, agreed strongly with Feinstein. 

John Feinstein’s assessment  of the PGA Tour playoffs is both accurate and forthright. For the tour to even hint that the playoff events are on the same level of prominence as the historically well recognized majors (Masters, U.S.Open, British Open, PGA Championship) is indeed a fool-hearty notion. We can only hope that the PGA Tour decision makers read and appropriately respond to Feinstein’s persuasive and well crafted argument. 
Marv Segal, Eden Prairie, MN

John Feinstein is right on regarding the FedEx point distribution and end-of-year playoffs, his Mickelson example being the most obvious. So that the season does count, I suggest 1,500 points for majors, 750 for the Players, keep 500 for tournament winners and all of the above keep those points to start the playoff season. They have won a major or a tournament and deserve to have a leg up on the field. Then have the first three playoff events be worth 1,000 points and the Tour Championship 1,250 points. Nothing should top the majors.Robert L. Cooney, Vero Beach, FL 
 

And finally, we received this plan from Hawaii

Your column is so right on. The playoffs don't work. The following is my plan, with specifics as to how it would have played out in 2010. There are two ways to qualify for the Tour Championship:

1) Automatic
a. winners of the four majors
b. multiple winners of tour events
c. winner of one tour event and loser of a major in a playoff

2) Three playoffs
a. 120 players enter Barclays. Cut after 54 holes; low 80 advance
b. 80 players enter Deutsche Bank. Cut after 54 holes; low 40 advance
c. 40 players enter BMW. No cut. Low 10 advance to Tour Championship

Notes:
1) FedEx points used to determine 120 for Barclays and never again
2) No carryover of points in playoffs
3) Four events opposite of World Golf Championships events not included 
4) No set number of players qualify for Tour Championship

2010 Example:

1) a. Mickelson, McDowell, Oosthuizen, Kaymer
    b. Els, Furyk, Rose, Stricker, Mahan, D. Johnson
    c. B. Watson

2) c. D. Johnson, Casey, Choi, Na, Kuchar, Moore, Goosen, Mickelson, Stricker, Wi 

With some overlap, 18 players would qualify for the Tour Championship. All would start even with a chance to win the FedEx Cup. Rationale: 1) Majors become more important than under current system;  2) Current point system too confusing for average fan; 3) Why would automatic qualifiers enter the 3 playoffs: to earn more money, to stay sharp for Tour Championship, to play well and have fewer opponents in the Tour Championship. 4) Golf playoffs more closely resemble those of other sports. 

What do you think? 
Frank Mauz, Honolulu, HI

Frank: Interesting system, with a lot of good thought.  But the fact that you have to answer that last question (Why will automatic qualifiers want to play in the playoff events prior to the Tour Championship), suggests why sponsors will not accept your plan.

Bob Carney

 

FedEx Cup Playoffs: Why Rolfing says it's working

NBC's on-course commentator Mark Rolfing spoke to a gathering of PGA Tour partners the other day and made a case, sincerely I think, for the fact that the FedEx Cup playoff system is working. Rolfing's "Top 5 Reasons: No. 5: The scores, most of which were at par or over when Rolfing spoke. In other words, this is a serious competition. No. 4: The buzz in the NBC trailer. "In year one, there was not a lot of talk because no one cared," said Rolfing. "Now it's a very logical, involved discussion. Now even Roger Maltbie knows what's going on." No. 3: Tommy Roy. "I know when Tommy Roy decides to do something totally out of the box, he's into it." And Roy's introduction of the Steve Sands chalkboard segments are exactly that, Rolfing said. No. 2: The players. "It's amazing the change I've seen in the players." Judging from player reaction in early years, said Rolfing, "You never would believe guys would be checking out the leaderboard to see how Charles Hoffman was doing." The FedEx Cup is causing players to make different choices, too. "Paul Casey shows me what the FedEx Cup means because he's not playing the Ryder Cup. You know the FedEx cup is working if you can make Colin Montgomerie mad." No. 1: "Me." Rolfing, who lives on Maui in Hawaii, says "I gauge my enthusiasm for thing by how I'm feeling going to Kahului airport. This week, I couldn't wait to get here." Even allowing for Rolfing's obvious conflict of interest, it appears he is now a convert. One thing Rolfing did not argue was that the scoring for the FedEx Cup, and the odds of any given player winning, are easy to comprehend, Steve Sands segments notwithstanding. But that's okay, said the Tour's Rick George, a former college football coach, who also spoke to the group: "Like the BCS, we should never find a way to make it perfect. Because then we wouldn't have all this banter."
Bob Carney

Your views on change at private clubs

In his October Editor's Letter, Jerry Tarde took an unusual stance for those of us who've known Jerry as a traditionalist over the years. He argued for change at private clubs, change not to be trendy, but rather so that those clubs would thrive and attract a clientele that lives in a very different world than their mothers and fathers did. Jerry's letter generated a lot of reaction. Reader Jim Devine objected to the idea that some denim, for example, is stylish and should be allowed. "For everyone wearing denim that fits that description, there are ten people who appear they have just come from working in the garden," wrote Devine. One letter, especially, beautifully defended the rules that survive at most private clubs. 

maar01_survey_tardeletter.jpg
Mr.Tarde, we read your views in the October issue of Golf Digest. In case you have forgotten, golf is supposed to be a gentleman's game. The idea that denim should be allowed once again shows how little esprit d' corps there is left in our country. When you are dressed sloppy you act sloppy--just look at our children in our schools. When you keep knocking traditions down then there is no discipline and without discipline, you have chaos. Isn't golf supposed to help teach discipline and manners? Of course it is. Our children are crying for discipline but no one has the courage to give it to them these days. Your recommendation's for change in this area our out of line so hope you reconsider your thoughts here long and hard.
Mr. and Mrs. Elliott Gassner, North Carolina

Jerry replies: Thanks for your email, Mr. and Mrs. Gassner. I certainly respect your point of view, having held it for most of my life. However, I see massive socio-economic change in America that threatens the existence of private clubs. The purpose of my column was not to say every club should concede every point, but clubs need to consider their future and engage in debate over what's no longer relevant. I look at old pictures of golf tournaments from the 1930s and see men in galleries wearing fedoras, suits and ties, and trench coats. Many would prefer that the dress code be the same today, but it's not and I think that a majority realize that there's a tradeoff and in the end golf is better off. Otherwise, it will return to being a game for only a few. I think on this point, we can agree to disagree. 

Bob Carney

It's "Fix the FedEx Cup" season

John Feinstein's column on the FedEx Cup has drawn several letters of response. To say Feinstein was critical of the playoff system is an understatement. He decried the fact that comparatively few points are awarded for major victories (2400 for all four vs. 2500 for winning the Barclays) and argued that the Tour Championship should decide the winner:  

Let's do this: Make the playoffs resemble the postseasons in other sports. Everyone starts at zero. If you are worried that the "regular season" will be meaningless, have a regular season bonus pool for the top 10 or top 20 players. That would be the equivalent of home field advantage in team sports (and would make the players happy since, let's face it, the only reason they care about the playoffs is the huge money involved). 

Golf World readers who wrote to us tended to agree. 

John Feinstein is right on regarding the FedEx point distribution and end-of-year playoffs, his Mickelson example being the most obvious. So that the season does count, I suggest 1,500 points for majors, 750 for the Players, keep 500 for tournament winners and all of the above keep those points to start the playoff season. They have won a major or a tournament and deserve to have a leg up on the field. Then have the first three playoff events be worth 1,000 points and the Tour Championship 1,250 points. Nothing should top the majors. 
Robert L. Cooney, Vero Beach, FL 

Without such a system, argues another reader, the final event lacks drama and loses out to its major rival, college football. 

My golf group, which number 32 members, completely supports John's comments: Use FedEx points to get to the top 120, then use the rest of the tournaments to set the top 30 [for the Tour Championship]. Everyone begins at zero; more what we want--a real challenge, better TV. We probably won't watch this year's. Come on Charley Hoffman and Matt Kuchar? Texas/UCLA looks better and so does Alabama/Arkansas. 
Craig Gillespey, Richardson, TX 

Not sure, Craig, if you're suggesting that the Tour Championship 30 begin again at zero. We like Feinstein's system, but it's not foolproof. Some readers and members of the media will not be happy if the playoffs don't produce a winner who has also won a major. Feinstein's okay with that happening, once you give those major winners sufficient credit (prior to the playoffs), for what they've accomplished. So are we.

Here's a breakdown of where the playoffs stand entering tomorrow's tour championship. 
Bob Carney

Your reaction to our putting package

It may be "drive for dough," but if you want to generate mail, apparently, it’s "write about putting." From the moment our October putting package landed, we’ve heard from you about it. Here’s a sampling: 

gd201010_cover_300.jpg
I've been suffering from erratic putting so this was a must read. Tried the image of where water would flow and immediately improved my green reading even on an unfamiliar course. Coupled with a more relaxed attitude and not thinking about mechanics it has instantly improved my putting. I've made several long breaking putts where normally I'd worry about 3 putting. Thanks for a great feature. 
W. Jamieson, Jr., Mendota, IL 

Thanks for publishing David Owen’s piece, "The New Way to Read Greens." It's about time somebody pointed out that Miller, Azinger, McCord and other TV experts who think that rolling golf balls are influenced by nearby bodies of water, cities, and mountains are just plain wrong. Yes, golf balls and other moving bodies are only influenced by "known physical laws." 
Jeffrey R. Hills, Dorset, VT 

The number one tip driving an imaginary tack into the ball when putting was attributed to Bobby Jones but was actually originated by Walter Travis. Bobby Jones credits Travis with this tip in his great book Bobby Jones On Golf Page 85 in the paragraph entitled "looking at the ball."I enjoy your magazine very much, Thanks for the entertainment and instruction.

Norris McElhannon, Newnan, GA 

Why women can't putt: The tables on page 90 of the October 2010 issue are misleading. Putting statistics probably follow a distribution that is more densely sampled for men than for women because there are more male golfers. For example if there are 3 times as many male as female golfers, try comparing the No. 50 female to the No. 150 male. 
Peter Lambeck, Ypsilanti, MI

If our research is correct, Mr. Lambeck is a researcher and professor at the University of Michigan. We appreciate his comments on our research. To Mr. McElhannon, thanks for the correction. 

Bob Carney

Ryder Cup: Your early ruminations

The Ryder Cup approaches. Your comments about it have already begun to arrive. Our old friend Lou Riccio, who put the sparkle in New York City streets when he was the city's transportation commissioner (by recycling glass bottles as macadam filler), sends a worthy preamble to the matches.

Like most golf nuts, I am really looking forward to this Ryder Cup. For me it will be a great event if three conditions prevail: First, I want it to be a superbly played, close competition. Second I want the US side to win. Third, I want the celebration immediately following the competition to be a champagne party with both sides partying together! Our opponents in this competition are our best friends in the world outside this hemisphere. The contest is intended to foster goodwill between counties and the sportsmen involved in the same gentlemanly spirit that is a basic tenet of our sport. The winners should toast the losers and the losers should cheer the winners. They should party together and everyone should celebrate. This should happen naturally, but it hasn?t happened in recent memory. The captains or the governing bodies should consider such a conclusion to what could be golf?s finest event if this is done. 
Lucius Riccio, NYC 

Another correspondent, however, can't quite get over the fact that the Ryder Cup is not out of the Woods.

In hard economic times, Tiger Woods, the monument to conspicuous consumption and immorality is thrust onto the world stage, the image of America, chosen over any number of hard working professionals who regularly score double digits better. Does anyone honestly think he will be welcomed and respected by the other members of team USA who earned the right to be there, and will they be motivated by his explanations for poor performance, dragging the team down to his level? If he cared about his county, the game and anything but himself he'd turn down the ill-advised invite in favor of one of the hot younger players who could make a positive contribution to team unity and performance. But, sadly that will never happen. 
Don Thompson, Statesboro, GA

Dare I say, Don, that you have the Statesboro Blues over Tiger's being on the team? (I'm sorry).  But there are many others--NBC, the PGA of America, the European PGA, Celtic Manor and the British tabloids among them, who are quite pleased that Woods  didn't turn down Pavin's offer. 

And just for the record, Jim Gray was right. 

Bob Carney 

Dumbing down golf, cont'd

Yesterday we posted a letter by Dr. Robert Weiner of Utah, who complained that public golf n this country was going to the dogs, or at least to a bunch of boors who don't fix ball marks and wear their hats backward. Dr. Weiner has retreated to a private club and objected when Jerry Tarde, in his Editor's Letter in October, might relax their dress codes and cell phone rules. But is public golf really so intolerable. I tested Dr. Weiner's argument this weekend and played Montauk Downs, a beautiful, state-park, Robert Trent Jones Sr. course on the far eastern end of Long Island. On a brisk morning the first weekend after the Labor Day crowds, my friend Rich and I walked on about 7:30, got assigned an 8:45 time with another twosome, and had time for a delicious, cholesterol-boosting, ham-egg-cheese sandwich, a cup of coffee and twenty or so practice balls off the mats on the range between holes 3 and 4. 

I won't give you every sordid detail of our rounds, but this was golf exactly as you daydream it. Not a cloud in the sky. Light breeze, 10-15 miles an hour, temperatures from high 60s to high 70s. Pleasant playing companions--a father and son, Eric, in his 50s, and Steve, in his 70s. They took a cart; we walked. I'm a 5, Rich about a 15, and we, like the twosome we hooked up, with played the white tees, meaning that pars were a possibility for all us and each of us made at least a couple. We played reasonably fast--4 and-a-half hours--though the ranger rightly prodded us on the back nine because we were a hole behind. Divots were replaced, ballmarks repaired, bunkers raked. A great walk, a great time, golf, Dr. Weiner, as you know and like it. 
 
As we packed up our clubs, we ran into a large group from western Long Island and Queens who had driven up to two hours to play the Downs for the first time. (Yes, it's that good.) They were packing Corona longnecks into a couple of coolers and had a list of questions about our round and the course. How were the greens?. Aerated, we said, but rolling fine. What tees did you play? Whites we said, 6300. Really, what handicaps? We told them and they seemed surprised we hadn't played it longer. Run into any walkers they asked, as if we might have stumbled upon a multi-car crash on the Long Island Expressway. We were (blanking) walkers, we said. Don't worry about walkers! We all laughed and they headed out under a perfect sky. They were different kinds of golfers than us; but they loved the game and would love the course, especially if they played the appropriate tees. (I think we convinced them the whites were right for them, 15-to-25 handicaps). I have no doubt they'd take care of the course, too. 

Dr. Weiner, we've all run into the idiots you complain about. But it's not a matter of public versus private, nor is it a matter of new golfers versus old. I've played behind incredibly slow golfers at private clubs and had to dig my ball out of their footprints in bunkers. (Don't get me started on ballmarks). It comes down to the standards at that course or club, standards that are maintained not only by the facility but by the golfers themselves. We pushed back on the walker question because our friends from Queens should know that it's not walking that makes for slow golf, it's slow golf. You're right to rue the rudeness that creeps in. But I think Jerry Tarde's point in his Editor's Letter is that it's not whether the hat is backwards or forwards, or whether the cart has a cooler, that determines what kind of golfer your playing with. It's closer to the heart than that. 
Bob Carney

Are we "dumbing down" golf?

In his Editor's Letter in the October issue, on the newsstand now, Golf Digest Editor Jerry Tarde argues in "The Case for Change at Private Clubs" that inclusiveness is the key to our game's health and growth. 

maar01_survey_tardeletter.jpg
"We need to encourage walking and pushing a cart or taking a caddy. But most of all, we need to develop a welcoming attitude that makes people--the young especially--feel comfortable in the golf environment...."

And on that contentious issue of backward hats, Tarde, a traditionalist, takes a surprising stance:

"69 percent of private clubs ban the wearing of hats backward. In other sports it's called a rally cap, used for good luck. Golfers think it's an anti-establishment declaration. For the young people I know, like Rickie Fowler and Bubba Watson, it's just a fashion statement... 

"Times are changing even if we resist...."

More than one reader took exception. Here's a strong letter from a doctor who plays at a private club and sees the public game going down the tubes.

I have been a golfer for over 60 years, have belonged to numerous private clubs (presently Promontory in Park City, UT and Entrada in St. George, UT), and strongly disagree with portions of your October editorial. There is no reason for golfers to dress like they are flying Southwest Airlines. "Proper attire" is not expensive. If you can afford golf equipment you can afford Bermuda shorts or kaki slacks, a collared shirt, golf shoes or sneakers. When have you ever seen professional golfers wearing golf caps backwards. Rally caps may be appropriate in baseball dugouts, but not on golf courses nor in clubhouses. It is one thing to dress casually, it's another to look like a hip hop slob. Next you will feel tee shirts, low riders, and flips flops are acceptable if it will get motivate someone to play golf. I am in favor of promoting junior golf, but I do not want to play behind a foursome made up of a 9 or 10 year olds. They should be allowed on the course late in the afternoons. Unfortunately, the days when I caddied during the day and then was allowed to play golf a twilight are history. It seems it has become acceptable to "dumb down" many aspects of life in America. Restaurants now considering tee shirts, cutoffs, and flip flops acceptable attire, airlines allow anyone to fly regardless of dress or personal hygiene, and "casual Friday" has become a contest to see who can look the grubbiest. Just because a private golf club tries to preserve a sense of propriety does not mean it is elitist. Early in my golfing experience I played on many public courses where I've seen shirtless, beer guzzling, load-mouthed hackers, leaving divots unfilled, ball marks unfixed, and sand traps un-raked. Fortunately, I eventually could afford to join a private club where members respected the course, other members, and the game of golf. It remains one of the few venues where common courtesy and etiquette is still expected and honored. Let's not turn it into a "low cost airline." 
Robert G. Weiner, M.D. 


Strong letter, Dr. Weiner. But our position is, the tradition ought to be about behavior and gentlemanliness, not necessarily about clothes. That's Jerry's point. At my club cargo pants are outlawed, as are untucked shirts and backward hats. I guess that works, but honestly the traditions I'd rather see preserved are taking caddies and playing fast. And how can you ban a backwards hat but allow a distance-measuring device at a private club where most everyone already knows the distances? What tradition is that part of? But I have to live with that because it makes the game more fun for some members, who argue, not convincingly in my view, that it speeds play.  Someone once said that all golf etiquette comes down to two things: taking care of the course, and taking care to treat your fellow golfers with respect. I'm not sure hats are involved. More tomorrow.
Bob Carney

Those 60th Anniversary puzzle answers!

We've received a load of letters from those among you who attempted the 60th Anniversary puzzle contest in the August issue. Some of you sought help with the 60 names. Some wanted to know if they got them right. And then there were the triumphant 60 who, after "winning" their Golf Digest 60th Anniversary hat for completing the puzzle correctly and getting their answers to us on time, sent us a note.

I received my hat yesterday.  Really like the design and fit of the hat.  I'm telling my friends it is my major award ( like the leg lamp in The Christmas Story).  Thanks again. 
Joey Popwell

You're welcome, Joey, and to all of the winners, congratulations.  And to everyone else, thanks for trying. Here is the list of names hidden backwards, forwards and sideways in on that last page in August. (BTW, one correspondent pointed out a 61st name. Can you find it?)
Bob Carney


ALFREDSSON 
ARMOUR 
CALCAVECCHIA 
CANIZARES 
CASEY 
COUPLES 
CRENSHAW 
DIMARCO 
FLORES 
FORSMAN 
FRANCELLA 
FURYK 
GARCIA 
HAMILTON 
HARRINGTON 
HORSCHEL 
IMADA 
IMMELMAN 
INKSTER 
IRWIN 
KELLY 
LANGER
LEONARD 
LEWIS 
LINCICOME 
MARINO 
MCILROY 
MICKELSON 
MIYAZATO 
MOODIE 
MORGAN 
MULROY 
NORDQVIST 
OLAZABAL 
O'MEARA 
PETTERSEN 
POULTER 
PRESSEL
PRICE 
PURTZER 
SENIOR 
SERGAS 
SINDELAR 
SLOCUM 
SNEDEKER 
STADLER 
STRICKER 
STUARD 
STUPPLES 
TRAHAN 
TRINGALE 
TSENG 
TURNESA 
URESTI 
VAUGHAN 
WADKINS 
WATSON 
WESTWOOD 
WHEATCROFT 
WOODS 

The latest on golf digest

Close

Thank you for signing up for the Tip of the Week newsletter.

You will receive your first newsletter soon.
Subscribe to Golf Digest
Golf Digest Tablet Editions

Twitter

Your Instagram Golf Photos
Subscribe today

Golf Digest Rewards

Golf Equipment: 3Balls.com - New and used golf equipment

Sign-up for Golf Digest's Above The Cut