Editor's Blog

Wie's Reno Exemption

Golf World reader Joe Martin of Philadelphia was the first to react to news yesterday that Michelle Wie had been offered and accepted an exemption into the PGA Tour's Reno-Tahoe Open. Joe addresses his ire at tournament director Michael Stearns.

Gwar01_080509wie_2

Dear Mr. Stearns:

Your decision to give Ms. Wie an invitation is nothing more than pure attention grabbing, and gate purse greed. I understand the opportunity of the publicity surrounding the decision, it will draw attention to the event, both positive and negative.

But this young lady has done nothing to deserve such an invitation. There are many more deserving players who could stand a special invitation rather than a so-so player with no wins, no contending stances, and a game that is less than most players on the Future tour or the Nationwide Tour.

I have favored the sponsors in the pass granting special invitations to players, I was in favor of having Annika playing the men's tour when she was the greatest ladies golfer in the world. I would be in favor of Lorena Ochoa who is now the best women's golfer. But to give a invitation to a player who is below average, struggling with a game that has not held up under pressure, and has withdrawn from more events than she has completed is very poor judgment.

And when she misses the cut, or withdraws from the event because of her wrist, headaches, dehydration, or her agent tells her to do so because she is embarrassing herself, you'll still have your gate sales, and there will be one player standing there who could have been closer to making the cut or being the story of the week because that player got a special invitation. But it won't happen because deals were made, arrangements set, and an invitation went out to an undeserving player who can't even play on her regular tour let alone the PGA tour. By the way is John Daly playing? There's another one for you.

Very sad Mr. Stearns, I for one will not watch the tournament, I would rather watch baseball, and I hate baseball.

Joe, several columnists landed exactly where you did on the issue. Here's Joe Logan of the Philadelphia Inquirer:

Dumb. Dumb. Dumb.

Michelle Wie, having apparently not learned her lesson, having apparently not been sufficiently humbled and humiliated by her past efforts, has decided to once again tee it up against the men, in next week's Legends Reno-Tahoe Open.

Add Tim Dahlberg of the Associated Press, who concludes that despite her lackluster performances, Wie still provides star power.

That's certainly the case at the Legends Reno-Tahoe Open, a tournament that draws a weak field and an even weaker gallery. Even though Wie’s star has faded, tournament organizers probably figured they had nothing to lose by seeing if the tired woman-against-men freak show story line would entice a few more people to buy tickets.

No, it’s Wie who is the real loser here. She’s the one who is going to get beaten down once again playing against men she has no business playing against.

Meanwhile, many of you are still writing to us on the weekend DQ. Check out Ron's Sirak view of that on Golfworld.com.

--Bob Carney

Comments

Archived Comments (3) Click to expand

Michael Stearns,
Your decission to have Michelle Wie play in the Reno Tahoe open is an embaressement to the PGA and to the whole golfing community. She should earn those benefits, not given special preference due to your's and the Wie's greed, and lack of concern for golf.

Posted by Shepherdra July 22, 2008 8:44 AM

Bob:
For some reason no one has really hit the nail on the head about Ms. Wie, especially in light of recent failure to sign scorecard and then once she knew she didn't, she did not go to officials and basically turn herself in for this infraction, as others have done in the past. The volunteers who ran after her on Friday after she had left the scoring tent/area enabled her to once again be protected from the hard core truth. And what do you think her parents said or did when she told them of her oversight? Did they tell her to call the rules officials? I doubt it. I am taking the hard line on this because I know and have lived in the culture of the players. You don't just skip along after you violated a rule. You open up to it and you take your medicine! If Michelle didn't think she had broken a rule, how has she been able to play tournament golf all these years, knowing that this is the procedure and necessary step? I am saying she did know and that she hid it from the media, the players, the officials, and maybe even her parents and still played the third round the next day, getting within one shot of the lead by the close of round three. Is she a cheater? Or is she one of the biggest ditz's to walk inside the ropes? You decide..... I know what I think.

Posted by lpgahf9 July 22, 2008 2:29 PM

Let me answer lpga's comment: I'm going with ditz, not cheater. Anyone who has ever played tournament golf should know job no. 1 is to keep your fellow competitor's score and your own and to get both checked and signed as soon as the round is over. Pretty basic stuff. But I also think, if I'm running that event, that I've failed if I've allowed a player to space out and skip away. Doesn't make anyone look good when that happens. Bob

Posted by Bcarney July 23, 2008 9:15 AM
Post A Comment

Latest Golf News

Subscribe today
Subscribe today