Editor's Blog

These Golf World "Punchline" guys are good! Here are this week's finalists and winner.

As you know, Golf World invites readers to contribute a snappy comment for one item in the Front 9 list each week. GW feeds the straight line; readers contribute the punchline, which we publish.  We've been getting so many good ones lately, we think the winner and the close contenders deserve a little more love. Henceforth, the Editors' Blog will publish those each week. 

For this week's issue: Golf World editors supplied this news item: 

Thanks to the raucous 16th hole, the Waste Management Open breaks the PGA Tour attendance record. 

And the readers took off on it. Golf World's Stephen Hennessy then selected the finalists and Editor Geoff Russell confirmed Steve's proposed winner. 

 He was Mike Coulson, Ventura, CA:
And with the beer free flowing, the tournament will be renamed the Wasted Management Open.
Other Finalists: 

Mark Harman, Ridgeland, SC:
As a result, overtime pay for Waste Management cleanup crew exceeds amount of purse.
Christopher Benner, Murfreesboro, TN:
A dubious achievement marred by the fact that most of those in attendance can't remember where they were.
MT Diehl, Orange City, IA:
In related news, the PGA Tour changes its slogan to, "These guys are loud."
Thomas B. Allen, Middletown, OH:
Immediately thereafter, in light of record beer sales, the Waste Management Open broke a record for waste management.
Love 'em all. Great job, guys. 

Bob Carney

Suggestion box: Let's do Phoenix every week!

Besides attracting more fans (on site) than any other tournament in history, the Waste Management Phoenix Open last week also produced a wonderful story of rebound resurrection on the part of Kyle Stanley. More than anything however, the tournament once again took stadium golf to an indelible level. That's what impressed this Golf World reader:

images-1.jpeg
As I watch this weeks tournament at TPC Scottsdale, I can't help but wonder why every single tournament on the schedule doesn't adopt their own par 3 stadium. Ever since Tiger created the golf boom, purists have continually complained about the behavior of the modern fan.  Cell phones ring. Cameras click. People move and yell during backswings. The list goes on and on. But the 16th hole at Scottsdale is the glaring exception.The constant buzz and hustle-bustle that surrounds the 16th has not only become a draw for fans but also a favorite of the players who obviously revel in the atmosphere that is commonplace to pro athletes of other sports.  So why not give the uninitiated golf fan a place to go?  
Build a stadium around the shortest par 3 at every tournament and let the drinkers drink and the talkers talk. The fans and the players would love it while the purists have the 17 other holes on which to enjoy the game the way they like. It's really a no-brainer for a tournament organizer--not to mention the networks. 
John Sheehan, Long Island City, NY 

Not a terrible idea, but finding a suitable par 3 is only the first challenge in replicating the noisy magic of No. 16. What the Thunderbirds have created in Phoenix is the combination of a state fair and and a rock concert where a little golf fortunately breaks out. This year, our sources tell us, in the middle of a continuing recession, the tournament sold 44 more $40,000 suites on the 16th hole than they had the year before! Holy Mackerel. John,  the real miracle of this tournament is the $4-$5 million dollars a year it generates for charity. Let's see other tournaments duplicate that!
Bob Carney

Readers react quickly to "Woman Undercover" report

Golf Digest's March report by Peter Finch with Kim Hall on the treatment of women in golf, both on the course and in the golf shop, has quickly generated reader response. These two early letters suggest that discrimination in the game may not be limited to women.

maar01_golf_women_intro.jpg

I thoroughly enjoyed reading Peter Finch's article "Woman Undercover" in the March 2012 issue. While it doesn't relate to me from the gender-bias standpoint, I can relate to many rounds I've had as a junior golfer, and even to rounds today. My friends and I are all sub-20 handicaps (some sub-10), all under 25 years old, and we get treated like punks who would rather destroy the course than play golf. In reality, we fix our divots, repair out pitch marks (as well as others), let people play through, but we're still sometimes looked at as a sort of threat to the course. I often receive the same treatment when shopping for/trying out clubs. I'm under constant surveillance when hitting into a simulator because I might "hit a bad shot into it an break it." I know they don't realize I've been around the game for 20 of my almost-23 years, but after seeing others hit into the screens, I'd be more concerned about them breaking themselves instead of the screen. 

Thank you for writing this article, and exposing how closed-minded and ignorant some courses/shops can be! I sincerely hope this will make going to the simulator/range/course a less intimidating experience for everyone who isn't a 30-to-50-something male country club golfer.
Josh Bernhofer 
Hinckley, OH
Very interesting and timely article. To be fair about it, anytime you are joined on the course in the middle of a round it's a little awkward whether it's male or female. Sometimes you would simply prefer to continue with the "mojo"" you have going. I've played golf for 50 years and gone out hundreds of times as a single and, yes, I've on occasion avoided some golfers I saw at the starter's booth. I've also been less than warmly received by the players I was paired up with. It's generally fun to hook up with a very good player but I've also been paired with tight-lipped "snobs" on the course. In other words, not all of the boorish and unfair treatment that women experience is necessarily because of their gender. Lastly, over the past 12 months I was paired with a female twosome who hit their tee shots from the forward tees...and then hopped in the cart and drove off, clearly hoping to avoid playing with my partner and I! We also played with a nice young woman who came out as a single. We didn't mention it to her but we both agreed it took some juevos for a woman to walk out on a public course dominated statistically by men. She played well and we enjoyed the day. 
To be brutally honest, in the bar later, we discussed her fortitude, her short game and her breasts, in that order.
Peter Marquard 
Northridge, CA

Bob Carney

Will belly putters drive equipment sales? Times says yes.

We've had lots of mail about the propriety or legality of long and belly putters. It's clear now that like it or not, more and more golfers, pro and amateur alike, are adopting them. Will belly putters be the spark that ignites this year's equipment sales? The New York Times seems to think so. In an article today by Adam Schupak calls the belly putter a "sensation": images-1.jpeg

The potential for gangbuster sales has those in the golf business jumping for joy. Sales of putters have decreased for the last nine years, according to the research firm Golf Datatech. In 2003 putter sales in on- and off-course shops were about $200 million. In 2011, that figure had dropped to $141.3 million, down 4.1 percent from the previous year. But those in the golf-equipment industry say belly putter sales could invigorate the category. 

 "The belly putter is the great white hope," said Steve Boccieri, the maker of the Heavy Putter.

With Spencer Levin using a belly putter to turn his career around and take a dominant lead into Sunday's final round of the Waste Management Open--and Webb Simpson chasing him with a belly putter of his own--there's certainly plenty of evidence right now that the long and belly putters can help your game. Whether there is enough of us to invest in that dream remains to be seen. But if you buy one and want to know how to use it, check out the Golf Digest story in which Webb Simpson explains how he does it.
Bob Carney

Golf World: What's up with your covers?

The Golf World cover never ceases to be a subject of debate. But 2012 covers seem peculiarly controversial. We've received a ton of mail on our choices already, some relating to our Sophie Gustafson cover, and the story of her breakthrough interview last year at the Solheim Cup. images.jpeg

Guys, after being a Golf World subscriber for many year's and an ex-PGA member, I wonder how could you not put President Clinton and Bob Hope on last week's cover? I adore Sophie, and the LPGA, but Mr. Clinton and Humana saved a classic. 
 Scott Swinney 
Louisville, KY

Mark Wilson has won 5 PGA tournament, but has never been on the cover of Golf World. His win at the Humana got minimum coverage in your 1/30/12 issue. Most of the article coverage was on Bill Clinton and his Foundation, which definitely played an important role in making the Humana a success. But there was a tournament for you to report on. What gives? 
Phil Stevens 
Lake Oswego, OR

But there were plenty of you who couldn't countenance a Clinton cover...

In spite of former President Clinton's political savvy and personality I still do not think he is a good spokesman for golf. As a notorious rules bender and golf scofflaw I think the only reason he played within the rules at the Humana was the intense scrutiny he was under. His reputation among serious golfers is poor at best although for an average viewer who really does not know much about golf he is a personable host. Jerome Guffey 
Eureka, CA

...and were perfectly happy with our choice.

The picture of Sophie Gustafson says it all...bright smile and full of joy. Great story of a courageous young woman. I could only imagine what she hasgone through all these years. 
Don Hurter

I have just received GolfWorld and read the article on Sophie. I am amazed that she must not have heard of the remarkable research at East Carolina University that has produced a small device which is worn in the ear which completely solves the stuttering .The device is called the SpeakEasy. I hope this will be a blessing to her. Many have had life-changing experience. Richard H. Evans, Jr. Kinston, NC

Actually, Sophie has tried the device. Unfortunately, it did not work for her. We hope our cover story did.

Bob Carney

Poll says Tiger is still the draw. By a lot.

You are fond of complaining here that we overdo our coverage of Tiger Woods. Golf World got just such a letter this week, claiming that it was becoming "Tiger World." Okay, a new poll out yesterday suggests that we aren't overstating Tiger's influence in the game. 

Turnkey Sports, in its monthly poll, asked sports executives two questions about who they'd want to watch on television. The results are pretty one-sided:

Which of the following golfers are you most interested in watching play on TV? 
Tiger Woods - 53% 
Rory McIlroy - 15% 
Phil Mickelson - 7% 
Dustin Johnson - 2% 
John Daly - 2% 
Sergio Garcia - 1%
Steve Stricker - 1% 
Tom Watson - 1% 
Zach Johnson - 1%  

Which of the following golfers would you be most interested in tuning in to watch in the final round of a golf tournament if he is leading after three rounds? 
Tiger Woods - 61% 
Rory McIlroy - 9% 
Phil Mickelson - 8% 
John Daly - 3% 
Tom Watson - 2% 
Dustin Johnson - 2% 
Sergio Garcia - 1% 
Steve Stricker - 1% 
Zach Johnson - 1% 
K.J. Choi - 1% 
Jim Furyk - 1% 
Translation: Tiger is still the man, especially when he's in contention. You watching that Abu Dhabi tournament this week?
Bob Carney

Hungover Caddy: Yes or No ?

Golf Digest's newest feature, the Hungover Caddy column, seems to have no fence-sitters. You love it. You hate it. Max Adler is responsible for the column each month, but it's HC, with his sardonic takes on every subject from bunker maintenance to the etiquette of talking to someone else's golf ball, who rules the realm. Not everyone sees eye-to-bloodshot-eye with him. For every one of these.... 

Love "Hungover Caddie" feature. Been waiting a long time for someone to talk seriously about how to rake a bunker.
Jeffrey Briggs 
Hollywood
We get at least one of these.... 

I, and I suspect a host of other Evans Scholars, am offended by your column "Hungover Caddie." Many of us worked long and hard to provide caddie services, starting as young teenagers, working through high school and being awarded the Evans Scholarship to attend college. The column is not funny -- in fact, it is an insult and offensive to those of us who have had the privilage to work in this profession. Please remove the column from your magazine.
Ken Marnocha 
Zionsville, IN

Humor either works or it doesn't, and it may work for you when it doesn't for me. As these letters and many others like them demonstrate, this is purely a case of what you consider funny. Don't see, however, how this is an insult to the sober, hard-working caddies among us, Evans Scholars or not. A Scholar myself, I've never thought that the column had anything to do with my kind of caddy. But I've known a few loopers over the years---none of whom would have qualified for the scholarship--who might have been the HC. The point is, it's meant to be fun. We're sorry if it doesn't appeal to everyone.
Bob Carney

Pecan Valley Golf Club, RIP

It's been way too common this year, on twitter, on the web, in our magazines, that we hear about another course closing. It's especially sad when that course has played an important role in the game's history, was designed by one of the game's outstanding architects, and has hosted a major. Or, in this case, all three:Pecan ValleyGolf Club in San Antonio, designed by Perry Maxwell, home to the 1963 PGA Championship won by Julius Boros. The announcement, earlier this month:images.jpeg

"As of January 9, 2012 Pecan Valley Golf Club is no longer open for golf. Ownership has decided to cease operations during the off-season months to investigate all viable options for the Pecan Vally Golf Course. Please check back with us at this website for updates on the course's status early this spring."
The closing drew this letter from a Texas pastor. 

I was saddened to read of the closing of Pecan Valley Golf Course. I played there only one time, but was paired with a man with a bucket-list of playing every public accessible course that had hosted either the US Open or the PGA Championship. His driver had an extra-long shaft to compensate for a short left arm. He contracted polio as a kid and his left arm, besides being shorter, had no strengthen. However, his left wrist was fused in the perfect supinated position from Hogan's "Five Fundamentals." That day he beat me like a drum at a high school pep rally. Pecan Valley may be closed but it gave me one of my great experiences in the game of golf.
Pastor Allen Mosiman Corpus Christi, TX


Well said, Allen. 


Bob Carney

Photo: Geoff Shackelford.com

Reader quits golf. Here's why.

We don't get many of these letters. Those who write us are, for the most part, wedded to the game, addicted in some cases, obsessed with getting better. Not reader Dean Wilson, who, by the way, is a pretty good player. He's had it. 

I'm 51 years old and have decided to abandon golf for a multitude of reasons. First let me say that it is not because I can't play well. My handicap is around 5 and I've won a few tournaments as a junior golfer. It's not uncommon for me to shoot even par on a regulation golf course a couple times per year. You must be thinking I'm crazy to quit.  

My five reasons for quitting a game I could never imagine quitting one day: 

Practice Time: I once did play to a 1 handicap. This required practicing my golfing skills at least four to five days a week and playing most of the other days. Admittedly my skill level has dropped in recent years because I simply do not have time for practice anymore. Family and career choices take precedent. It's become frustrating and wearisome taking three from the edge of the green or only hitting six greens in regulation. Simply stated, it's not very much fun playing at a lesser skill level. 

Cost: The price of game is exorbitant. I recently resigned from a local club because dues and other ancillary costs computed to about $300 per round of golf. Playing golf at nice resorts costs a minimum of $125 and sometimes as much as $300. Then you have the cost of equipment. A newly designed putter retails for $200 to $350. Are you kidding me? One golf club? And the thing even more incredulous is that the golfer procuring said putter will likely not putt any better than his/her bullseye putter sent to the club bin long ago. 

Modernism: An old grade-school chum introduced me to a group of guys stating, "Dean began playing golf before it was cool." What an interesting comment. It's now cool to play golf because of the media frenzy, money, and celebrity. Golf was a game where the toughest survived. Pros attended Q school and then had to qualify each week to get one of a few spots at tournaments. I remember reading stories of Trevino practicing until his hands bled or the leg pain Hogan endured each round after his horrific auto accident. Palmer, Nicklaus, and Player were class acts especially with fans. My dad once said, "In my day the clubs were made of wood and the players made of steel." 

Golf Fans: Is anyone else irritated when some cretin at a golf tournament shouts "Get in the hole" after a player hits a drive? Is there no etiquette and class anymore? The mania that is the 16th hole at the Phoenix Open is nothing more than a booze-up for classless boors who determine their golf success by the number of beers consumed in 18 holes and how many vulgar remarks they can utter to the cart girl. USGA 

Capitulation: I can hit a golf ball further today than when I was younger and more supple. Why? The equipment is juiced. Golf balls fly farther and clubs invoke greater distances. We also now can use laser devices for distance. The USGA has caved in to equipment manufacturers and those who argue "the game is more fun." The club or the ball should not cause greater distance or ease in shaping a golf shot. That is supposed to reside with the player.
Dean Wilson

Dean, we won't try to talk you out of it. But we will say that golf remains a great sport for the reasons it always has: the places we play, the fun of play well (for us), and most of all the people with whom we play. Even as age takes some of that second reason away, we would miss Nos. 1 and 3 a lot. And we expect you will, too. Let us know if you change your mind.
Bob Carney

Enough with the Tiger, Tiger Tiger!!! Or not.

Tim Rosaforte's Voices column in Golf World this week, with details of Tiger Woods' move to Jupiter, and sightings of him and his kids at the local mall, seemed innocent enough and mildly interesting to some of us. Not, however, to this California reader, who has had enough of Tiger until he raises his profile as a golfer. It's a sentiment we hear often, except from the other half of the readership who can't get enough of all things Tiger. 111208_tiger_feinstein_140.jpg

Is it an obsession with this publication to inform us of Tiger Woods every move ?! Westwood, Poulter and Stricker won tournaments last week. The LPGA's season was expanded. Luke Donald and this wife just had an addition to their family. But who gets full page coverage just because he is enjoying his new digs--Tiger Woods! The readership and this reader, in particular, would like to be informed of the events in all of the Golf World and not just Mr. Woods'. How is Mr. Mickelson and his family or David Toms and their, respective, families doing these days?
M. Marlene Godoy, D.D.S. Irvine, CA

So which camp are you in? Had enough--or not enough--of Tiger Woods? Judging by a recent quiz we did that included a question about Tiger  Masters, most of you think he'll win again there, and hope he does. What's more I suspect his pairing with Tomy Romo at Pebble Beach will draw tons of attention and viewership. Sorry, Doctor.

Bob Carney
Close

Thank you for signing up for the Tip of the Week newsletter.

You will receive your first newsletter soon.
Subscribe to Golf Digest

LEADER BOARD


Subscribe today

Golf Digest Rewards

Golf Equipment: 3Balls.com - New and used golf equipment

Sign-up for Golf Digest's Above The Cut