CLOSE

Two views of First Golfer, Barack Obama

Sports magazines venture gingerly into the world of politics. Here are two letters, reacting to Golf World's coverage of President O'Bama's golfing habits, that suggest why.

gwar01_090601obama.jpg

Dear Editor,
It was great reporting to read that that President Obama played golf four times last month in your July 6th issue. Don’t be disappointed his scores were not available. After all, the many magical rewards and reasons for playing “the greatest game of all” have little to do with numbers on a scorecard.

Golf is a wonderful escape (for young and old), where you enjoy friends, have an outdoor experience, get some exercise, and maybe make a few good swings. Which are all more important reasons than numbers on a scorecard for playing again.

Michael Hebron
Master PGA Golf Professional
Smithtown, NY


Dear Editor,
Please explain why you insist on including a blurb on Obama in everyone of your issures. I have cancelled several magazines subscriptions because of wall to wall coverage of this man.

I use to be excited about getting Golf World but I will cancel my subscription if you keep adding articles on him. What is the point, he's not a good golfer, he has nothing to add on playing golf except he sucks at it.

I've got news for him and you, his golf swing isn't the only thing that needs work.

Carolyn Jackson
Weldon Spring, MO

Thanks, Mike and Carolyn. Here is our reasoning for covering the President, for what it's worth. First, we're happy that someone in a position of power and influence these days is not apologizing for his (our) sport. Second, we have covered every golfing president, regardless of whether he played down the left or right side of the fairway. See previous items on the Bushes, and, of late, Ike in Golf World. (John Strege even suggested in his Local Knowledge blog that George H.W. Bush ought to be considered for the Hall of Fame). In Golf Digest Tom Friedman interviewed Clinton, Dan Jenkins played with 41 (a round chronicled in Don Van Natta's book on presidential golf).. Finally, we're proud when the President plays our game. But we'll keep them short.

--Bob Carney

(Photo by AP)

LPGA Revolt

Ron Sirak's coverage of the revolt against its Commissioner Carolyn Bivens has peaked your interest in things LPGA. John Slike offers a solution to its woes.

images-5.jpeg

Dear Editor,
I have read with interest the letter being sent to LPGA commissioner asking her to resign. I understand that the LPGA has major problems but a new commissioner is not the answer. Your magazine several months ago quoted Jan Stephenson stating what the problem with the LPGA is and she was roundly criticized for saying it. Too many Koreans dominating the tour has led to lack of interest in both spectators and sponsers. Unless something is done the Tour, as we know it, will collapse.

A golf tour needs heroes, someone to bring interest. The men have Tiger and Phil and others. The ladies had Nancy, then Annika, and recently Lorena, but having a different Korean with unrememberable names winning most of the time has caused a major loss of interest.

What to do? About two years ago, the Commissioner attempted to invoke a language requirement but was shot down for suggesting this probably unworkable idea. My suggestion is that the LPGA limit the number of foreign-born players to a certain number per country, say five, and they would have to qualify to fill those spots. That way they would have a chance to compete on the tour and even if one of them dominates as Annika and Lorena have, or even as Se Ri did, they would create a fan base. This would be a drastic measure, but, in my view, a necessary one.

John E. Slike
Camp Hill, PA

John, though some folks would recoil at your suggestion--it sounds too much like what other countries sometimes do to us--I know you've made it in good faith. It's a point of view that has been kicked around on web sites and blogs like Geoff Shackelford's. My own view is that we should avoid quotas at all cost, especially one aimed at a particular country, as this one is. I believe that first because I think no country has a monopoly on great human interest or engaging personalities. Not long ago I played in a pro-am with one of those rising Korean stars, Kyeong Bae, who was not only a hell of a player but delightful person to be with. Now I root for her. But you don't because you don't know her.We need to do a better job telling hers and the stories of other foreign players on tour. Not to be glib about this, but as someone who grew up in Detroit, I used to think of the New York Yankees as foreigners. Then, 25 years ago, I moved here and began listening to sports radio and got to know them, their stories, their scandals, and now I pull for them. My favorite player of all? Hideki Matsui, who speaks no English on the record, but who is as close to Al Kaline as any Yankee gets.

It's a challenge to tell the stories of the LPGA kids who speak little English, no doubt. But the LPGA and the media have got to work at it. And, frankly, fans can work a bit harder to learn who they are, too. Because they can play. The bigger issue now is the lack of U.S. LPGA events and the loss of great tournaments like Corning. How are you going to meet Kyeong Bae without them?

--Bob Carney

Stevie's Bib

Something about Steve Williams, Tiger's caddy, removing his caddy bib prior completing the 18th hole, bugs the heck out of you. We get a protest almost every week, few as comprehensive as the second one here.

images-3.jpeg

Dear Editor,
At the conclusion of Tiger's tournament on Sunday why does Steve Williams get to remove his caddie bib while he approaches the 18th green? Noticed this before, but only with him! Is there a rule or some kind of protocol for this? To the non-golfers he may look like a player--maybe this is what he wants?

Tom Daniels
Saint Marys, PA


Dear Editor,
Like John Hawkins column, The Angry Golfer, this email is from The Angry Fan.

Is it just me--out of line and getting too old and nit-picky, or some other readers comment on this matter too?

I refer to Tiger Wood's caddie, Steve Williams removing his caddie's vest prior to the official end of the round of golf. He does this each and every time, and I question what rules of proper attire for caddies might govern his actions. It seems that all caddies are required to wear the vests, so I imagine there is some regulation to dictate how they look and when they are to be worn. If that is the case, why is Williams the only one (that I have ever seen) to remove it before his player putts out on the final hole? I believe he removed it Sunday at the AT&T before Tiger reached the final green?

He wears a logo for Valvoline Motor Oil on his shirt, so I imagine he is capitalizing on Tiger's celebrity to get air time for his "sponsor".

I resent his actions, and think it should be addressed by the policy board for proper conduct by tour caddies. If he can take it off before play has ended on the 18th hole, does that allow all the other caddies to do the same? Would the PGA Tour officials allow them to start disrobing on the 17th hole? The 16th?

In my humble opinion, Mr. Williams acts way too big for his britches anyhow, as demonstrated with his confiscating a fan's camera a year or so ago; or when he called Phil Mickelson a "prick" last year. While I appreciate Tiger's effect on the game, there is still an older generation of us who enjoy the game whether he is playing in the field or not; and who feel this wonderful game has been around much longer than all the great players, and will outlast all the fame and celebrity and fanaticism that Tiger's play can generate in his short lifetime. If honors are bestowed on a great golfer, then so be it, but let's keep his employee in line with all the other caddies in the field.

Would you please inform me of what is correct and proper in this matter? I decided long ago that Golf World is the only magazine on golf that I need to read, and I know your writers will provide a definitive answer to all of us who find his actions irritating. If you can't comment, then who should I contact to get an answer to my question?

I have found over the many years of subscribing to Golf World, that it is the only magazine about my favorite pastime I have ever needed. Keep up the good writing and reporting on the game.

Ed Church
Spartanburg, SC

Ed, thank you for those comments about Golf World. Now, on to the matter at hand. I have spoken to Tour officials who tell me that there is indeed a policy that requires caddies to wear the bibs for all 18 holes. It does not specify, however, just how much of that 18th hole the caddy is required to keep the bib on, though one might assume, all of it. Nonetheless, without their saying so explicitly, I concluded that the Tour chooses its battles and this is not one it wishes to choose. No use poking the Tiger, what? It may be annoying, and it may also be not in keeping with the spirit of the regulation, but from the Tour's point of view, is this worth a fight. Probably not, from its point of view.

--Bob Carney

Billy Burke: One man's legacy

Bill Fields' memorable column on Billy Burke's triumph in the 1931 U.S. Open at Ohio's Inverness Club (Golf World, June 29) drew a knowledgeable note from old friend Bruce Loman, who grew up here in Connecticut and then, after selling Callaway clubs in the early days of that start-up, moved to California 20 years ago to join Ely and company.

Dear Editor, Great article about Billy Burke. The teaching legacy that he left at the 9-hole course in Naugatuck, CT ( Hop Brook ), has never been explored: Two Connecticut state junior champions, a state woman's champion, four PGA club professionals, including John Geleski, who was the head professional at Watertown C.C. and won the Connecticut Open. (John's son Mike is Executive V.P. of Peter Jacobsen Sports.) On any given Saturday morning there were a dozen players under 5 handicap setting up games. Most worked in the same foundry at some time, including my dad, who won the club championship a half a dozen times. I myself have been in the golf business for 40 years with the Bob Hope and Dinah Shore tournaments, as well as 23 years with Callaway Golf.

If you look back I think Billy had a lot to do with all of it. Thanks!

Bruce Loman
Newport Coast, CA>

Thanks, Bruce. It's the legacy of folks like Billy Burke who keep the game alive. Golf World and Golf Digest don't have room to give them all their due, but Bill's article, and your letter, help.

--Bob Carney

Golf World grading system

Golf World creates a report card after every major, assigning a grade to the performance of every player in the World Ranking Top 10. In this latest grading, Tiger got a B +, Phil an A -, Paul Casey an F, etc. In the view of a Virginia reader, our grading this time barely achieved a passing mark.

Dear Editor, You often use the public school grading system to describe the performance of key golf professionals. You did it in your June 29th issue which covered the Bethpage Black US Open in depth - almost. I have to give you a C minus on that issue because of the paucity of coverage of David Duval who was arguably, the best story of the open. Don't misunderstand, I'm not to taking anything away from Phil, but guys you could at least given David his own article. It's inexplicable: You did it for Mickelson, Barnes, Weir, Mediate and a host of others, but not Duval?

Tom Jones
Roanoke, VA

Fair point by you, Tom. Duval was a big part of the game story, but he easily could have merited his own sidebar. I'll remember this Open for a conversation I had with Bob Rotella near the putting green on Friday morning. Rotella was working with Mike Weir. When they finished he came over and I asked, who do you like this week? Bob said, "I like this guy," referring to Weir, "and you know else is really in a good place?"

"Who?" I asked.

"David Duval," Rotella said.

Being all-knowledgeable but also very polite I didn't suggest that Bob was smoking something.


--Bob Carney


Phil Mickelson

Phil Mickelson's near-miss in the Open left some fans searching for a reason why the popular one can't win the People's Open.

gwar01_070126hawkins.jpg

Dear Editor,
I don't mean to be critical of Phil, but I really beleive he puts to much more emphasis on pleasing the fans than he does about his game. I am a diehard Mickelson fan, but I don't believe he locks himself in at certainA times in tough situations. It amazes me how such a great player can play so poorly at times. Not only the Open, but look what he did at the St.Jude Classic. If he would have only parred the 18th every day he would have been 6 shots better.

Jack Gordy
Fayetteville, NC

Interesting analysis, Jack. There is no doubt that Phil feels an obligation to please the fans, like Arnie in that respect. And like Arnie, he also feeds off the fans' adulation. Can you remove one and keep the other? Not sure...

--Bob Carney

Woods defended!

We get a surprising amount of mail that questions Tiger Woods' talent, well-being, schedule, vocabulary and "pampering" by the media. We even get them, like one from reader John D. Riley of St. Augustine, FL, questioning why Tiger's caddy, Steve Williams, is allowed to remove his caddy bib before completion of the 18th hole. We get surprisingly few defending the greatest player ever. Here's one.


images-2.jpeg

Dear Editor,
I know that Mr. Woods hardly needs anyone (else) to speak for him or his golf game, but I feel you gave short shrift to the result of his place in the draw even as you pointed out that only 1 player in that side of the draw was in the top ten after the first 36 holes. In fact, it appears that everyone who finished ahead of Tiger started in the other side of the draw. I would just like to state this fact: Tiger was the only player in the tournament with 3 rounds under par. Luck of the Draw notwithstanding, I believe had he been on the late-early side of the draw, he would have won going away. In no way would I add this performance to "the growing list of majors he let get away". And I certainly wouldn't bet against him in the remaining two majors for 2009.

Respectfully,

Jay Sedrish
Playa del Rey, CA


Well said, Jay. Tiger got the tough end of the scheduling stick at Bethpage, but I doubt that he's cutting himself any slack because of it. I do think he's spending a lot of time working on his putting, which is what really cost him the Open title. As for the the rest of the majors, I'm with you. Take him in every pool you can.


--Bob Carney

Four-letter "bombs"

"Some guy hit my fender and I said, 'Be fruitful and multiply,' but not in those words." Woody Allen

In the July issue of Golf Digest columnist David Owen argued that "the occasional unscripted F-Bomb makes golf on TV easier to endure." Not so fast, said one Idaho reader.

Dear Editor,
Regarding the "Fleeting expletives" article by David Owen: To compare dropping four-letter "bombs" to ads for ED or prostate issues in the TV decency debate is like comparing raisins to coconuts. Golf has always been and should always remain a gentleman's game, the last bastion of its kind. That being said, it remains that a gentleman does not need to use 4-letter "bombs". End of debate.

Sharon Hanson
Boise, ID

Thanks, Sharon. Just how we keep golf a "gentleman's (or gentlewoman's) game" is a tough one. At our club, for example, we're currently engaged in a debate about cargo shorts, a piece of apparel that is seen as ungentlemanly by a lot of our members. Not part of the game's great tradition, what? I know that language is very different than this and it's disquieting to hear a professional athlete utter a word you'd prefer your kids not hear and certainly not repeat. And I'm not sure I'd argue that it makes golf on television better, except, as David argues, that it allows us to see more of Tiger, who seems prone to these utterances. There are obscenities I'd attack first, however, the primary one being slow play. I suspect it's the source of more foul language than imperfect shots, and the source of most golf "road rage", as Bill Pennington reported in the Times over the weekend, which results in some very poor language. If the pros all take off their hats and shake hands after the round, that forgives momentary language lapses for. Provided they play at a reasonable #$%^#ing rate of speed.

--Bob Carney

Golf in the Olympics

The jury is still out on the golf in the Olympics, with the decision to come within weeks. The PGA Tour, once skeptical, now leads the crusade to have golf added to the games. Our friend from Michigan, Justin Blair, is leaning "no", especially after watching the year's second major.


Dear Editor,
No way should golf be an Olympic sport--and this is coming from a golf fanatic. Four- and-a-half majors; the Ryder Cup, Presidents and FedEx Cups; the WGC events... that's asking too much. Unless, of course, they use amateurs for the Olympic Games... which they won't. The USGA, PGA and R&A are interested in "growth" (or: How To Make More Money In An Already Expensive Sport) so I can understand their need to push so hard. It's too bad that Jack and Annika's integrity look compromised.

Justin Blair
Three Rivers, MI



Justin, there are those in leadership who see the game's growth as something separate from game's economics. They genuinely love the game and want more people, young and old, to play it. So I'm not quite sure I quite agree that growth necessarily makes the game more expensive. Although to your point, the present recession seems be initiating a correction in costs. Or, as the great Dan Jenkins has said, "There's nothing wrong with golf that a good depression won't fix." Thanks for your letter.

--Bob Carney

Back-to-back Opens

Golf World's news of the 2014 "double major" at Pinehurst, when the USGA will conduct it's men's and women's Opens back-to-back, generated this intriguing idea from a Florida reader:

Dear Editor, To Mr. Ron Sirak and Mr. Ryan Herrington: I have always thought back-to-back (men's and women's) tournaments were a fabulous concept. Better yet would be back-to-back Masters at Augusta. A Masters for men followed by a Masters for women. This, in my view, would be a grand slam for every party involved. The Masters Committee themselves would be congratulated by women golfers and women around the world. It would be a public relations boost and a huge, positive jolt for golf, to say the least. Whatever you could do to present and push this idea would be appreciated. Perhaps you could let me know what you may think. I realize there would be obstacles, but I think the idea remains fabulous.

Jack Ridolph
The Villages, Florida

Very interesting idea, Jack. The obstacles you speak of our huge, however. On the other hand, so were the odds against the USGA conducting its two big events back to back. I remember a conversation with former USGA president Judy Bell, now in the World Golf Hall of Fame, when the idea was discussed at the Executive Committee level back in 1998 at Blackwolf Run. Judy confirmed that the idea of holding Opens simultaneously at contiguous sites had been raised. I said, "So you could use Winged Foot West and Winged Foot East, for example?" And she replied, "Yes, or Pebble and Cypress!" We did not get simultaneous Opens--too impractical--but in 2014 we will get back-to-back Opens, and that's pretty cool. And if that can happen....

--Bob Carney

Subscribe today

Golf Digest

Subscribe >

Golf World

Visit Subscribe
Phil Mickleson Dvd
Subscribe today

Best Places to Play — Course Finder

Advertiser Events & Promotions

tworules
Should USGA rules on equipment allow different specifications for amateurs and professionals?
Subscribe today
2009 Hot List

Equipment Ratings

Our editors have put their seal of approval on this year's top equipment.

Best Courses In U.S.

Which courses are on the must-play list? Here are the best America has to offer.

Golf Digest Ambush

Send us the details of your upcoming trip and you might be featured in Golf Digest!

Hollywood Rankings

See who made the cut in our ranking of Top 100 Golfers in Hollywood.