- Text Size:
- Small Text
- Medium Text
- Large Text
-
Focus on Your Faults
- By Peter Sanders with Max Adler May 2008
I say if you don't use statistics, you don't want to get better. Golf's emotional: We remember a round by its scars and its highs, the chunked chip or the drained 40-footer, and this clouds the perception of even the most self-honest people, even great players. Mathematics is the language of the universe. Knowing precisely what's costing you shots is the quickest way to shave shots.
But the nuances of your game will get lost in the one-dimensionality of traditional statistics. For instance, Fairways Hit ranks the blooper that lands in the fairway as better than the ripper that flies 260 and ends up in the first cut. Two putts from 60 feet get counted the same as two putts from five feet. The examples are endless.
That's why I developed an online program of algorithms (ShotByShot.com) that breaks down a round into specific areas and interpolates a player's performance in each.
These four golfers submitted a minimum of 15 custom scorecards, and my program tracked their handicaps in Long Game, Chipping/Pitching, Sand Shots and Putting. Each then set a target of making their weakest handicap as good as their strongest. I've always said that skill in one area is an indicator of potential for any area.
-
LONG GAME
- Roger Sonntag / Calgary, Alberta
- I always felt I was a poor putter, but in reality my approach shots were placing too much pressure on my putting. Filtering my stats, I discovered the telltale sign of a poor round (80 or higher) was my average distance to the flagstick on a green hit in regulation. It was nine feet farther than in my sub-80 rounds. My home course has lots of tiered greens, so a lack of precision really kills. That's why improving my Long Game Handicap, rather than Putting, was the most efficient way to lower my scores.
- Find out how he did it >>
-
SAND SHOTS
- Christina Semmens / Madison, Ala.
When I started keeping my stats, I'd been playing golf for only a year. I was overwhelmed: It seemed like every facet of my game needed improvement. I'm by no means a number cruncher, but because I've played a lot of endurance sports (swimming, running, triathlons), which are all about mechanical efficiency, using stats to narrow my searchlight made sense. It's great being able to tell an instructor exactly what you want to work on. For me, it was distance control on sand shots.
- Find out how she did it >>
-
CHIPPING/PITCHING
- Geoff Goss / Mississauga, Ontario
- I'm a Type A personality, and I decided one day I was sick of the C Flight. I was surprised when the numbers bounced back and said chipping and pitching were the worst parts of my game. When you play with higher-handicappers, like I do, I guess you get used to mediocrity. I was below average for my handicap in two areas: average distance to the hole and percentage of shots that miss the green.
- Find out how he did it >>
-
PUTTING
- Nicole Morales / Mount Kisco, N.Y.
Because my Long Game Handicap was 5, my coach, Cheryl Anderson, said there was no reason I couldn't achieve that level in Putting. Studying my stats, we knew to zero in on putts from 21 to 30 feet. A typical 5-handicapper would three-putt only 10 percent from that range, so that was my goal. It's neat knowing the averages for each level of player and then trying to beat them, though I'm only 11.
- Find out how she did it >>
- Text Size:
- Small Text
- Medium Text
- Large Text
