Should only a middle- or high-handicapper look at those weird-shape, alternative drivers? Given that not-so-high-handicappers like Ernie Els and K.J. Choi have used square drivers, it might not be as simple as shape.
It's true that the odd shapes tend to be clubs with stable and forgiving clubheads designed to push the U.S. Golf Association's "moment of inertia" limit of 5,900 gram-centimeters squared). Some of the funky designs also exhibit lighter, longer shafts, but in other areas the differences might not be as great. For example, the CG on TaylorMade's alternative-shape Burner is only two millimeters farther back from the face than the CG on the company's more traditional-shape r7 Superquad, according to Todd Beach, director of metal-wood development.
"It's not just a head question because they're built differently with different functionalities," Beach explains. "If you tried to lump it together as 'high MOI' versus 'standard,' then it gets a little more complicated because each club has a different CG with different shaft lengths and weights. So I don't know that it's as easy as grouping it by clubhead type."
Of course, you won't know the difference between standard and strange until you get on a launch monitor with a qualified expert. And the new shapes aren't going away. Nike and TaylorMade will offer sharp-angled, high-MOI geometric heads in the coming months, and they won't be alone. Are traditional-shape drivers an endangered species?
"Just think about 460 cubic centimeters," says Rick Wahlin, metal-wood designer at Nike. "Ten years ago, it was crazy to think that a tour player would hit that kind of club. It was so radical. But 460 was more radical to what things were like 10 years ago than what square is to 460 today."